Systematic reviews and meta-analysis
Keywords |
Classification |
Keyword |
OFICIAL |
Medicine |
Instance: 2020/2021 - 1S
Cycles of Study/Courses
Teaching language
Suitable for English-speaking students
Objectives
The practice of Medicine – from diagnosis and prognosis to therapy and prevention – is clearly linked to the development, critical appraisal and application of high-quality scientific evidence to support healthcare of the highest quality. Evidence synthesis studies, namely systematic reviews and meta-analysis, increasingly have a crucial role as a response to the growing accumulation of scientific evidence of heterogeneous nature, design and quality.
Learning outcomes and competences
At the end of this course, students should be able to: adequately define clinical research questions in this context; plan and conduct adequate bibliographic searches; define study selection criteria and assess the quality of included studies; extract and process data from included studies; understand and apply statistical methods in the context of a systematic review and meta-analysis; present, write, and critically appraise systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
Working method
Presencial
Pre-requirements (prior knowledge) and co-requirements (common knowledge)
Not applicable.
Program
Scientific Research in Health and Medicine. Evidence Based Medicine.
Evidence synthesis studies – definitions and classification.
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis – operational phases:
- Research question formulation;
- Bibliographic searches;
- Studies selection;
- Data extraction and processing;
- Study quality assessment;
- Statistical analysis in evidence synthesis studies – Meta-Analysis;
- Assessing between study heterogeneity;
- Publication and other bias in evidence synthesis studies;
- Presenting a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis;
- Writing and publishing a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mandatory literature
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors).; Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.0 (updated July 2019). Cochrane, 2019. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook., John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2019. ISBN: 9781119536659
Sutton, A. J., Abrams, K.R., Jones, D. R., Sheldon, T. A. & Song, F. ; Methods for Meta-analysis in Medical Research, London, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2000
Teaching methods and learning activities
The course will have a total duration of 14 hours; 7 hours of theoretical classes and 7 hours of theoretical-practical classes. After the presentation of each topic there will be time to solve practical exercises, typically using specific software. An e-learning platform will be used to support theoretical and practical classes.
Software
Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.4, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020. Available at https://training.cochrane.org/online-learning/core-software-cochrane-reviews/revman
Evaluation Type
Distributed evaluation with final exam
Assessment Components
Designation |
Weight (%) |
Exame |
60,00 |
Trabalho escrito |
40,00 |
Total: |
100,00 |
Amount of time allocated to each course unit
Designation |
Time (hours) |
Estudo autónomo |
17,00 |
Frequência das aulas |
14,00 |
Trabalho escrito |
10,00 |
Total: |
41,00 |
Eligibility for exams
The students should be present in at least 75% of the classes.
Calculation formula of final grade
Evaluation: Theoretical test (60%); Submition of a practical assignment (40%)
Examinations or Special Assignments
In the practical assignment the student has to answer a set of questions in the context of the execution of a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Special assessment (TE, DA, ...)
Special assessment periods will be allowed for typical cases, including employed students and members of the students' representatives association.