Ontology II
Keywords |
Classification |
Keyword |
OFICIAL |
Philosophy |
Instance: 2023/2024 - 2S 
Cycles of Study/Courses
Acronym |
No. of Students |
Study Plan |
Curricular Years |
Credits UCN |
Credits ECTS |
Contact hours |
Total Time |
FILO |
44 |
FILO - Study Plan |
3 |
- |
6 |
41 |
162 |
Teaching language
Suitable for English-speaking students
Objectives
1. To a
cquire the
basic conceptual tools for the study of Ontology and for the study of each author analysed; to
consolidate the skills
already acquired in the previous semester;
2. To d
evelop analytical and critical skills regarding the texts of the philosophical tradition and the issues ontology is concerned with.3. To understand the modern and contemporary developments of metaphysics as science (from XVII century to the present)
4. To identify and to characterize both
the main paradigms of ontology from XVII century
until the present and the philosophical issues they are concerned with. Learning outcomes and competences
1. To manage and to use correctly the conceptual tools of Ontology, according to the technical vocabulary of each author studied.
2. To develop theoretical and critical skills regarding the philosophical issues concerning Ontology.
3. To identify and to characterize the main schools and doctrines in contemporary ontology.
Working method
Presencial
Program
I - Introduction:
1. From Metaphysics to Ontology: paradigm shift ?
2. The rebirth of Metaphysics: Francisco Suárez .
a) what does it mean, for existence, "to be real"?
b) discussion: is Suarez's metaphysics realistic or mentalistic?
II . Christian Wolff
1. The Wolffian cogito: a symbiosis between consciousness and world
III - Kant and the impossibility of Metaphysics as Science
1. Kant's criticism to traditional metaphysics and the stablishment of transcendental philosophy.
2. the possibility of ontology as a critique of reason.
IV Ontology and Metaphysics in postkantianism.
1. The metaphysical and anti-metaphysical diatribe: Heidegger, Carnap, Quine, Collingwood.
2. Returning to Aristotle: ontology and the fundamental structures of reality
Mandatory literature
Christian Wolff; Pensamientos racionales acerca de Dios, el Mundo y el alma del hombre. Sí como de todas las cosas en general (Metafísica Alemana), Akal, 2000
Kant, Immanuel, 1724-1804;
Crítica da razão pura. ISBN: 972-31-0623-X
Heidegger, Martin, 1889-1976;
El^ser y el tiempo
R. G. Collingwood; An Essay on Metaphysics, 2014
Carnap, R.; The Elimination of Metaphysics Trought Logical Analysis of Language, 1932
Quine, W. v. A.; On What There Is, 1953
Complementary Bibliography
Michael LOUX; Metaphysics. A contemporary Introduction, Routledge, 2006
E. J. LOWE; A Survey of Metaphysics, OUP, 2008
Meirinhos, José Francisco 340;
As^Disputações Metafísicas de Francisco Suárez. ISBN: 978-972-8932-87-9
Paul Guyer (ed.); Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure reason, 2010
Oliveira e Silva et alt. ; Metafísica. Itinerários de um Conceito, 2018
Teaching methods and learning activities
Theoretical-practical lessons, based on the explanation of doctrines and the analysis of philosophical texts, and on the discussion of its arguments with students
keywords
Humanities
Evaluation Type
Distributed evaluation without final exam
Assessment Components
Designation |
Weight (%) |
Exame |
90,00 |
Participação presencial |
10,00 |
Total: |
100,00 |
Amount of time allocated to each course unit
Designation |
Time (hours) |
Estudo autónomo |
121,00 |
Frequência das aulas |
41,00 |
Total: |
162,00 |
Eligibility for exams
75% over the total classes
Calculation formula of final grade
Two written tests (in the middle and at the end of the semester) and oral participation. Each test 50% (being there included the share of the 10% oral participation). The second test can be replaced by a written work of about 6 pages to be submitted via moodle and to be presented in class.
Students not approved in the distributed evaluation process without a final exam should perfome a final examination.
The weight of this final exam is 100%.
Internship work/project
Not applicable
Special assessment (TE, DA, ...)
Not applicable
Classification improvement
Students whishing to improve their mark should performe the final exam (weighting 100%).