| Code: | M.BIO034 | Acronym: | DISS |
| Keywords | |
|---|---|
| Classification | Keyword |
| OFICIAL | Molecular Bioengineering |
| Active? | Yes |
| Responsible unit: | Anatomy |
| Course/CS Responsible: | Master in Bioengineering |
| Acronym | No. of Students | Study Plan | Curricular Years | Credits UCN | Credits ECTS | Contact hours | Total Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M.BIO | 23 | Syllabus | 2 | - | 30 | 6,5 | 810 |
| Teacher | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Maria Judite Tavares Moreira Novais Barbosa |
| Tutorial Supervision: | 0,50 |
| Type | Teacher | Classes | Hour |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tutorial Supervision | Totals | 1 | 0,50 |
| Ana Paula Gomes Moreira Pêgo | 0,00 | ||
| Maria Judite Tavares Moreira Novais Barbosa | 0,00 | ||
| Manuel João Rua Vilanova | 0,00 | ||
| Raquel Madeira Gonçalves | 0,00 |
The curricular unit Dissertation is planned for individual work of research and development of original experimental character leading to the writing of a scientific dissertation. The theme should be in the area of the degree, aiming at the integration and application of knowledge, skills and attitudes acquired throughout the course for the resolution of complex problems of bioengineering. The work shall consist of research and/or technological development, involving experimental means and/or simulation. It should promote the development of capacity for initiative, decision-making, innovation, creative and critical thinking.
The dissertation work can be a research project and/or technological development and application work, involving experimental and/or simulation means that promote the development of initiative, decision-making, innovation, creative and critical thinking skills.
It should involve the analysis of new situations, the collection of relevant information, the development and selection or design of approach methodologies and tools to solve the proposed problem, its resolution, the exercise of synthesis and elaboration of conclusions, and the preparation of a relevant dissertation subject to public presentation and discussion of the results
The deadline for delivery of the provisional version of the dissertation will be defined by deliberation of the Scientific Committee of the Master's course. The public exams for the presentation and defense of the dissertation will take place at the end of the academic semester in the period reserved for evaluations.
The Dissertation work must be carried out through individualized guidance to each student by a supervisor and, where appropriate, co-supervisor. The work can be carried out in an academic environment or academic and company/hospital. In the latter case the objectives, nature and form of monitoring of the work shall be subject to a prior agreement between the student and advisors on the part of the School and the company/hospital (the model contract will be provided by the secretariat of course), and validated by the Director of the Course in order to ensure the attainment of the objectives of the curricular unit, and protect any issues of confidentiality on the part of the company/host institution.
Proposals must be submitted by the proponent to FEUP's SIGARRA system.
To do so, access the following address:
https://sigarra.up.pt/feup/pt/estagios_processos.ver_processo?p_id=32776&pv_perfil=PROP
It is anticipated that a proposer may wish to formulate a dissertation proposal for a specific student. In this case, the student's name should be clearly indicated in the additional field provided for this purpose.
| Designation | Weight (%) |
|---|---|
| Defesa pública de dissertação, de relatório de projeto ou estágio, ou de tese | 100,00 |
| Total: | 100,00 |
| Designation | Time (hours) |
|---|---|
| Elaboração de relatório/dissertação/tese | 810,00 |
| Total: | 810,00 |
According to "Master's Dissertations, Norms for its operation" at FEUP, the final classification will be attributed by a jury appointed by the Master's Scientific Committee and which will include one of the supervisors.
The evaluation components will have the following weights:
- Technical-scientific quality of the work developed: 50%;
- Quality of the dissertation document: 35%;
- Quality of presentation and public discussion: 15%.
These components must be evaluated quantitatively by each member of the jury on a whole scale from 0 to 20. The final grade of the dissertation is expressed on an integer numerical scale from 0 to 20 and results from the simple arithmetic mean, rounded to unity, of the grades awarded, individually, by each member of the jury.