Code: | OPT164 | Acronym: | DRC |
Keywords | |
---|---|
Classification | Keyword |
OFICIAL | Medicine |
Active? | Yes |
Responsible unit: | Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences |
Course/CS Responsible: | Integrated Master in Medicine |
Acronym | No. of Students | Study Plan | Curricular Years | Credits UCN | Credits ECTS | Contact hours | Total Time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIMED | 6 | Plano Oficial 2021 | 2 | - | 2 | 19 | 54 |
5 |
1. Previous concepts
1.1. The coercive power of the legal norm, as a distinctive element between law and ethics
1.2. Concept of legal good vs. protection and protection of the right
1.3. Legal goods related to clinical records
1.3.1. The Right to Privacy and Confidentiality
1.3.2. The duty of secrecy and medical secrecy
1.4. De jure constituendo, the secret of the medical student.
1.5. The safety, integrity, non-manipulation, preservation, preservation, and reliability of clinical records
1.6. The duty to provide information
1.7. The right of access to information
1.8. The right of re-use
1.8. The legal meaning of the clinical register, as a representation of a past reality
1.9. Essential legal aspects in a clinical register
4.1. Your immediate interest, care
4.2. Its usefulness in the investigation and exercise of teaching functions
4.3. Your interest in Administration of Justice
4.3.1. In the preparation of medical-legal
4.3.2. In the preparation of Technical-Scientific Opinions by the Medical-Legal Council
4.3.3. Syntagmatic and reciprocal interest
4.4. Its meaning and probative value
4.4.1. In the judicial field
4.4.2. In the field of institutional financing
4.5. As memory of institutions and representation in the evolution of knowledge
5.1. Concept, meaning, meaning, objectives and scope of reuse
5.2. Legal framework for re-use for R & D purposes
5.3. The right to reuse as a researcher right
5.4. The authorization of holders of clinical records and their anonymization
5.5. The status of the investigator as guarantor of the rights of holders of clinical records
5.6. DAtaREuseCertificate for Research (DARE) certification of the Suitability of sources and the legality of access.
5.6.1. Transparency and reproducibility of research
5.6.2. Security of investigators, guardians and publishers
6.1. Legal concept of health information
6.2. The duty to draw up clinical records
6.3. Ownership of the clinical process
6.4. Meaning and significance of keeping a clinical record
6.5. Access to clinical records
6.6. The legal certainty of clinical records
7.1. The legal responsibility of the physician
7.2. The legal responsibility of health facilities
7.2.1. Ensure the preservation of the nature of permanent conservation
7.2.2. Ensure access
7.2.3. Ensuring safety
7.2.4. Ensure the guard
7.2.5. Ensure integrity
8.1. In access to clinical records
8.2. In the safety of clinical records
8.3. In re-use of clinical records for R & D purposes
8.4. In re-use of clinical records for educational purposes
8.5. In the protection of natural persons
9.1. Disciplinary responsibility
9.2. Civil liability
9.3. Criminal responsibility
9.4. The principle of Open Administration, meaning, meaning and limits in relation to clinical records
9.4.1. Meaning, meaning and limits
9.4.2. The conflict of rights between duty to inform and medical confidentiality
10.1. The legal classification of permanent preservation of clinical records
10.2. Legal liability for custody
11.1. Identity of who acceded
11.2. To what end (report of grounds)
11.3. When and where (date and equipment)
11.4. What level of authorization did you have vs What level did you use?
11.5. You tried to use the level for which you had no authorization
11.6. The concrete situation legitimized "Break the Glass"
11.7. Internal Audits and Reporting
11.8. External audits by independent entities
12.1. Building Alerts
12.2. Mandatory and automatic notifications
12.3. Preservation and non-manipulation guarantees
12.4. Internal Audits and Reporting
12.4.1. By clinical process, with identification of the natural person and reason
12.4.2. By natural person, with identification of the process and reason
12.5. External audits by independent entities | Universities
13.1. What is CADA and what are its competences
13.2. Legal value of CADA's deliberations
13.3. RAI as a legal figure in access to information
13.4. The role of RAI in the specific field of access to health information
13.5. Origins of requests to RAI
13.6. Law, Doctrine and Jurisprudence that underpins RAI's decisions
14. The dispersion of positive law, de jure constituto, and the need to rethink it, de jure constituendo
14.1. Essential and imperative elements of a clinical record
14.2. The initial end in which they take place
14.2.1. The provision of health care
14.2.2. The administration of justice
14.3. Its design
14.4. Different plans of interest, immediate and medium
14.5. Management
14.6. Preservation and non-manipulation
14.7. Access
14.8. Reuse
14.8.1. For research and development (R & D)
14.8.2. For educational purposes
14.9. Exchange
14.10. Non-communicable information
14.10.1. Third Party Registrations
14.10.2. Personal notes
14.11. Property
14.11.1. Legal, attributed to the holder
14.11.2. Intellectual
14.12. The legal and institutional ownership and responsibility of the
14.13. Audit
16.13.1. By health professionals, intellectual authors of clinical records
14.13.2. A wrong access
14.13.3. The security
14.14. Different security plans
14.14.1. Legal
14.14.2. Physics, logistics and software algorithms that support and represent clinical records and the networks where they circulate
14.14.3. In technical assistance to software and networks
14.15. Scope:
A single and exclusive legal instrument regulating all the dynamics and purposes inherent in clinical records and their impact on the protection of the personality rights of natural persons, whether these natural persons are the patients or health professionals who are the intellectual authors of those registers, whether individuals public law, universities, research centers, hospitals, or private law.
Theoretical-practical classes (TP) classes with great interactivity with students through a methodology of systematic questions on the topics to be addressed. The process of evaluation is continuous, according to a systematized order of knowledge, understanding, application, critical analysis and synthesis, culminating with the evaluation. The theoretical approach is made with systematic questions addressed to the students, in such a way that the participation of all is guaranteed, which simultaneously allows to assess the level of knowledge, the understanding of the same, the ability to apply them and on them critical analysis and synthesis.
Practical questions are placed weekly on the topics covered, with the quotation of each question, which allows a continuous and practical assessment and guarantees transparency and fairness in the students' evaluation. The results of the weekly evaluation are published weekly. The sum of these weekly assessments will be weighted at 60%. In the last class, there is a written exam, with ten questions of Boolean answer, with a quotation of one value each, and a topic for development with the quotation of ten values. The weighting of this final exam is 40% and it is not allowed to consult legal diplomas or supporting texts.
Designation | Weight (%) |
---|---|
Exame | 60,00 |
Participação presencial | 40,00 |
Total: | 100,00 |
Designation | Time (hours) |
---|---|
Estudo autónomo | 35,00 |
Frequência das aulas | 19,00 |
Total: | 54,00 |