Resumo (PT):
Abstract (EN):
The recent technological developments have granted citizens worldwide access to the Internet, including in
handheld devices, and offered them new communication possibilities. Nevertheless, they have also exposed
them to more cybernetic attacks, as criminals gained new opportunities for cybercriminal practice. The (perceived)
increase in the number of cyberattacks faces Law Enforcement with two major challenges: firstly, the higher
the volume of cyberattacks, the harder it is to dedicate the necessary resources, including human, to fight them;
secondly, the range of sophisticated stealth technologies used by cybercriminals to remain anonymous online
hamper the work of the forces. This paper argues that, since (cyber)criminals use language to communicate, their
anonymisation can be undermined by the language that they use because language use is idiosyncratic, so each
speaker makes a particular use of their language (Coulthard, 2004). This is enabled by Forensic Linguistics, which
can be broadly defined as the application of linguistic analyses in legal or Law Enforcement contexts. This article
presents two illustrative cases of cybercrime to show the potential of the forensic linguistic analysis. The first is the
case of an anonymous set of text messages spreading defamatory contents, whose linguistic analysis enabled the
sociolinguistic profiling of the author, and hence narrow down the pool of suspects. The second presents a cross
border cybercriminal practice: fraudulent and deceptive messages sent to citizens for purposes of extortion. The
article concludes by discussing the potential of the linguistic analyses in the fight against (cyber)-crime, and making
recommendations for Law Enforcement.
Language:
English
Type (Professor's evaluation):
Scientific
Contact:
Disponível em: https://bulletin.cepol.europa.eu/index.php/bulletin/article/view/550