Ethics and Political Philosophy
| Keywords |
| Classification |
Keyword |
| OFICIAL |
Philosophy |
Instance: 2025/2026 - 1S
Cycles of Study/Courses
| Acronym |
No. of Students |
Study Plan |
Curricular Years |
Credits UCN |
Credits ECTS |
Contact hours |
Total Time |
| MFIL |
14 |
study plan |
1 |
- |
6 |
41 |
162 |
Teaching Staff - Responsibilities
Teaching language
Suitable for English-speaking students
Objectives
1.To consolidate and to develop the knowledge and skills acquired during the first cycle of studies in Ethics andPolitical Philosophy.
2.To understand the conceptual framework that underlies contemporary discussions about Ethics and PoliticalPhilosophy.
3.To develop a critical reflection on different theoretical references and conceptual connections in this area ofknowledge and field of research.
Learning outcomes and competences
The apprehension and consolidation of knowledge assumes the theoretical presentation of philosophical themes and their discussion with the students, so as to question and interpret the knowledge and skills described in the Unit syllabus. This implies the deployment of theoretical knowledge in order to create an autonomous reflection, conducive to the development of relevant skills of analysis, argumentation, and problematization.
Working method
Presencial
Pre-requirements (prior knowledge) and co-requirements (common knowledge)
Not applicable.
Program
1. Ethics and Political Philosophy in the contemporary world
1.1. Ethics and Political Philosophy: monist and dualist theories
1.2. The “Political” in philosophy: delimitations of the “political field”
1.3. “Politics” in philosophy: conceptual confluences and divergences
1.4. Critique of modern political reason
1.5. Ethics and Politics in democratic societies
2.1 Liberty, Power and Violence
2.2. Ethics in the public sphere
2.3. Politics of recognition and identity
3. Fundamental questions of contemporary Ethics and Political Philosophy
3.1. Between conflict and consensus: practical reason and communicative reason (J. Habermas)
3.2. Evil as the absence of thought and totalitarianism as radical evil (Hannah Arendt)
3.3. The good as rationality and justice as a good (J. Rawls)
Mandatory literature
Alain; Essai sur la Conscience du Mal, Hatier, 1995
Alves, João L. (org.); Ética e o Futuro da Democracia, SPF – Edições Colibri, 1994
José Luis L. Aranguren;
Etica y política
Luís de Araújo;
Sob o signo da ética. ISBN: 972-8594-09-7
Luís de Araújo;
Ética. ISBN: 978-972-27-1881-3
Hannah Arendt;
Homens em tempos sombrios. ISBN: 972-708-150-9
Arendt, Hannah; Considérations Morales, Payot – Rivages, 1996
Hannah Arendt;
A^condição humana. ISBN: 972-708-637-3
Arendt, Hannah; Compreensão e Política e Outros Ensaios, Relógio D'Água, 2001
Jurgen Habermas;
The theory of communicative action. ISBN: 0-7456-0386-6
John Rawls;
Uma^teoria da justiça. ISBN: 972-23-1715-3
Jean-Paul Resweber;
Le questionnement éthique. ISBN: 2-87601-160-3
Peter Singer;
Como havemos de viver? A ética numa época de individualismo
Monique Canto-Sperber;
Dictionnaire d.éthique et de philosophie morale. ISBN: 2-13-047729-1
Teaching methods and learning activities
Theoretical exposition of the syllabus contents, text analysis, presentation and discussion of (individual and / orgroup) research papers, under the supervision of the teacher, about one of the proposed themes.
keywords
Humanities > Philosophy > Ethics
Humanities > Philosophy
Evaluation Type
Distributed evaluation without final exam
Assessment Components
| Designation |
Weight (%) |
| Participação presencial |
25,00 |
| Trabalho escrito |
50,00 |
| Trabalho prático ou de projeto |
25,00 |
| Total: |
100,00 |
Amount of time allocated to each course unit
| Designation |
Time (hours) |
| Frequência das aulas |
41,00 |
| Trabalho de investigação |
120,00 |
| Apresentação/discussão de um trabalho científico |
1,00 |
| Total: |
162,00 |
Eligibility for exams
Not Applicable.
Calculation formula of final grade
The final graderesults from the weighted arithmetical average of all assessment elements: participation in class (25%); critical reviewsof suggested readings (25%); final research paper, with presentation (50%).
Examinations or Special Assignments
Not Applicable.
Internship work/project
Not Applicable.
Special assessment (TE, DA, ...)
Accordingly to the assessment regulations.
Classification improvement
Possible improvement in the classification by oral exam.
Observations
Not Applicable.