Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > MSOCI025

Sociology of the Territory

Code: MSOCI025     Acronym: SOCTER

Instance: 2016/2017 - 2S

Active? Yes
Responsible unit: Department of Sociology
Course/CS Responsible: Masters in Sociology

Cycles of Study/Courses

Acronym No. of Students Study Plan Curricular Years Credits UCN Credits ECTS Contact hours Total Time
MSOCI 35 MSOCI - Study Plan 1 - 6 -

Teaching language

Portuguese

Objectives

Knowledge about the course main theoretical and methodological issues, emphasizing the new forms of organization of the space and the territory; raising awareness towards the importance of territory interdisciplinary perspective; emphasize the global nature of urban and social change, considering the phenomena of social and geographical mobility, migration, ethnicity, culture and lifestyles; knowledge of new forms of representation and traits of social rural space; initiation to operational knowledge in order the conception of research projects and professional intervention.

Learning outcomes and competences

Deepening of theories concerned with specific issues of territory sociological analysis; development of a critical and reflexive attitude in terms of territory; comprehension of the new social and cultural features of contemporary cities; ability to integrate knowledge and solve problems, particularly in metropolitan, urban and rural planning, in the context of multidisciplinary teams.

Working method

Presencial

Program

1. The emergence of the problematic of space and territory: historical and cultural factors 
2. Analytical dimensions of the territory and interdisciplinarity 
3. The sociological approach of the territory
4. Main transformations in territory: the limits of the dichotomy rural versus urban and the 
operacionalization of the concept of urbanization. 
5. Social structures and spatial structures: practices, representations and appropriations of the spaces. 
6. Local Identities and cosmopolitan spaces. From ruralities to etnolandscapes. 

Mandatory literature

Carmo, Renato Miguel; Sociologia dos territórios. Teorias, Estruturas e Deambulações, Mundos Sociais, 2014. ISBN: 978-989-8536-33-4
Choay, Françoise; O^urbanismo. ISBN: 85-273-0163-6
Ferreira, Álvaro et al. (org. ; Metropolização do espaço Gestão territorial e relações urbano-rurais, Rio de Janeiro, Editora Consequência, 2013
Domingues, Álvaro; Vida no campo. ISBN: 978-989-8217-19-6
Domingues, Álvaro; A^rua da estrada. ISBN: 978-989-8217-06-6
Fortuna, Carlos e Leite, Renato P.; Diálogos urbanos, Coimbra, Almedina, 2012
Fortuna, Carlos ; Identidades, Percursos, Paisagens Culturais, Celta, 1999
King, Anthony (Ed) ; Re-Presenting the City: Ethnicity, Capital and Culture in the Twenty-First Century Metropolis, New York University Press, 1996
Lima, Luísa; Cabral, M. Villaverde & Vala, Jorge (Coord); Atitudes sociais dos portugueses. Ambiente e desenvolvimento, ICS, 2004
Pinto, José Madureira e Queirós, João (Orgs.); .); Ir e voltar: Sociologia de uma colectividade local do noroeste português (1977-2007), Edições Afrontamento, 2010
Rémy, Jean; Voyé, Liliane ; Cidade: Rumo a uma Nova Definição?, Porto, Afrontamento, 1994
Sassen, Saskia; The Global City: London, Tokyo, New York, Princeton University Press, 1991
Soja, E.; Postmetropolis: Critical Studies Of Cities And Regions, Oxford: Backwell, 2000

Complementary Bibliography

Reis, Manuela e Lima, Aida Valadas de ; Desenvolvimento, território e ambiente. In J. M. Leite Viegas e A. Firmino da Costa (Orgs.), Portugal, que modernidade?, Oeiras: Celta Editora, 1998
Fortuna, Carlos; Leite, Rogério Proença (orgs; Plural de cidade: novos léxicos urbanos, Edições Almedina, 2009
Jacobs, Jane; Dark Age Ahead, Random House, 2004
Lopes, João Teixeira; A cidade e a cultura: um estudo de práticas urbanas, Edições Afrontamento e Câmara Municipal do Porto, 2000
Fernandes, António Teixeira; Espaço Social e suas representações. In Sociologia, 1992
Fortuna, Carlos (org.) ; Cidade, Cultura e Globalização, Lisboa, Celta, 1997
Silvano, Filomena; Antropologia do Espaço, Celta, 2001
Silva, V. e Carmo, Renato (Coords,); Mundo rural: mito ou realidade, Brasil, Annablume, 2012

Teaching methods and learning activities

The classes have a theoretical and practical component (TP) and are complemented by specific bibliography and pedagogical tools (slides, texts, ST outputs, developed summaries, conferences).
Still be held Tutorial Sessions (ST), consisting in the analysis of texts from key authors and aiming to question and deepen the course contents.

 

Software

Não se aplica

keywords

Social sciences > Sociology > Urban sociology
Social sciences > Sociology > Rural sociology

Evaluation Type

Distributed evaluation with final exam

Assessment Components

Designation Weight (%)
Exame 50,00
Participação presencial 15,00
Trabalho escrito 35,00
Total: 100,00

Amount of time allocated to each course unit

Designation Time (hours)
Estudo autónomo 74,00
Frequência das aulas 54,00
Trabalho de investigação 34,00
Total: 162,00

Eligibility for exams

Exam: 50%

Essay: 35%

Presence and participation in classroom: 15%

Calculation formula of final grade

Exam: 50%. Work in tutorial sessions: 50%. Minimum mark: 10 in each component.

Special assessment (TE, DA, ...)

The students who, according to the law are not abe to attend the classes must get in touch with the teacher at the begining of the year. Those studentswill be evaluated by an exame and a thematical report. Each of these components has 50% weight. The exam dates as well as the reports presentation will be the same applied to all the other students.

Classification improvement

For the purpose of improving classification only considers the assessment of the written component, the improvement must be performed for all predicted written works. For this purpose remains unchanged the classification obtained in component of participation in the classroom.

Observations

Students who did not obtain a minimum of 10 marks in each of the evaluation components should go to appeal, repeating the component(s) in which the mark was negative.
Recommend this page Top