Code: | FILO027 | Acronym: | LOG1 |
Keywords | |
---|---|
Classification | Keyword |
OFICIAL | Philosophy |
Active? | Yes |
Responsible unit: | Department of Philosophy |
Course/CS Responsible: | Bachelor in Philosophy |
Acronym | No. of Students | Study Plan | Curricular Years | Credits UCN | Credits ECTS | Contact hours | Total Time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FILO | 0 | FILO - Study Plan | 1 | - | 6 | 41 | 162 |
Teacher | Responsibility |
---|---|
João Alberto Cardoso Gomes Pinto |
Theoretical and practical : | 2,50 |
Tutorial Supervision: | 0,50 |
Type | Teacher | Classes | Hour |
---|---|---|---|
Theoretical and practical | Totals | 1 | 2,50 |
João Alberto Cardoso Gomes Pinto | 2,50 | ||
Tutorial Supervision | Totals | 1 | 0,50 |
João Alberto Cardoso Gomes Pinto | 0,50 |
The aim of this subject is to encourage students to develop skills in reasoning (deductive, essentially) and master some of the key concepts of logic in order to apply them
- in the analysis of philosophical theses based on arguments, and
- in understanding some philosophical positions for which the results of logical research are considered important (or, alternatively, irrelevant).
Strict application of the following key concepts of logic: argument, premise and conclusion; proposition, truth-condition and truth values; ambiguity; valid and invalid argument; deductive and non-deductive argument; inductively valid and inductively invalid argument; counterexample for an argument; correct (sound) and incorrect (unsound) argument; counter-argument; logical form; valid and invalid argument form; logical analysis and decision; logical consequence.
Not applicable.
Part 1. Basic issues.
- Arguments.
- Propositions and truth-conditions.
Part 2. Analysis and (intuitive) evaluation of arguments: the new problems.
- Valid and invalid arguments.
- Sound and unsound arguments.
- The (basic) notion of counterexample.
- 'Visualizing' and 'analogizing'.
- The (derived) notion of counterexample (counter-argument).
Part 3. From analysis and (intuitive) evaluation of arguments to Logic.
- Logical form.
- Valid and invalid argument-forms.
- The tasks: logical analysis and decision.
- The notion of logical consequence.
Notes on the study of the works in the reading list will be provided during the classes.
Theoretical-practical classes. Lectures and classroom discussion of cases and examples particularly relevant and/or complicated; practical exercises with comparison of the results obtained. Students are encouraged to participate in the discussion of examples and to resolve the exercises.
Designation | Weight (%) |
---|---|
Exame | 100,00 |
Total: | 100,00 |
Designation | Time (hours) |
---|---|
Estudo autónomo | 121,00 |
Frequência das aulas | 41,00 |
Total: | 162,00 |
Not applicable.
Final exam: written test. The exam mark will be rounded to the nearest whole mark. (With intermediate tests to check or consolidate knowledge, according to the pace of classes.)
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
According to the regulations in force.
Final exam (appeal call).