Dissertation
Keywords |
Classification |
Keyword |
OFICIAL |
Heat Transfer and Fluid |
Instance: 2012/2013 - 1S
Cycles of Study/Courses
Acronym |
No. of Students |
Study Plan |
Curricular Years |
Credits UCN |
Credits ECTS |
Contact hours |
Total Time |
MIEM |
10 |
Syllabus since 2006/2007 |
5 |
- |
30 |
14 |
800 |
Teaching language
Portuguese
Objectives
Objectives:
An individual project that should comprise the knowledge acquired during the degree through problem resolution in the area of Thermal Energy.
This project takes place in an academic environment which fosters students’ initiative, decision making and individual or group work.
Learning Outcomes:
It should foster the analysis of new situations, the research of important information, the selection of approach methods and tools to solve the problem, its resolution, summary and conclusions, report writing, public presentation and discussion.
Program
Projects related with Thermal Energy
Teaching methods and learning activities
According to what have been defined, the different stages of the project will be oriented by an academic supervisor.
Evaluation Type
Distributed evaluation without final exam
Assessment Components
Description |
Type |
Time (hours) |
Weight (%) |
End date |
Attendance (estimated) |
Participação presencial |
7,00 |
|
|
|
Total: |
- |
0,00 |
|
Eligibility for exams
According to General Evaluation Rules, students should exclusively work on this project.
Students are supposed to:
At the beginning of the year
- To be enrolled on the course
Up to the beginning of the project:
- theme of the project and academic supervisors must be approved
- distribution of projects
- date of delivery
During the project:
- Appointment of the Panel
- Project monitoring
- Panel’s final assessment
Calculation formula of final grade
- A mark from 10 to 12 out of 20 represents a work which complexity is low, where only minimum objectives were reached;
- A mark from 13 to 15 out of 20 represents a work which complexity is medium, where all objectives were reached in an autonomous way;
- A mark from 16 to 17 out of 20 represents a very good work which complexity is high, where all objectives were reached or surpassed with an high level of autonomy;
- A mark of 18 out of 20 represents an excellent work that is presented and defended outstandingly, with a very well structured report, concise and complete and with an high level of autonomy and performance that was noticed by the academic supervisor(s);
- Marks above 18 out of 20 should have an extraordinary character and should only be given to students who have reached an outstanding level in all of the items of assessment and that have presented innovative solutions. The mark should be unanimously given and a document should be attached to it and signed by all of the members of the Panel in order to justify the decision.
Examinations or Special Assignments
- Progress report
- Final report
- Webpage
- Presentation