Saltar para:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Início > Publicações > Visualização > Transient and steady-state models for simulated moving bed processes: numerical solutions

Transient and steady-state models for simulated moving bed processes: numerical solutions

Título
Transient and steady-state models for simulated moving bed processes: numerical solutions
Tipo
Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional
Ano
2004
Autores
C. P. Leão
(Autor)
Outra
A pessoa não pertence à instituição. A pessoa não pertence à instituição. A pessoa não pertence à instituição. Ver página do Authenticus Sem ORCID
Alírio Rodrigues
(Autor)
FEUP
Revista
Vol. 28 9
Páginas: 1725-1741
ISSN: 0098-1354
Editora: Elsevier
Indexação
Classificação Científica
CORDIS: Ciências Tecnológicas > Engenharia > Engenharia química
Outras Informações
ID Authenticus: P-000-8ZY
Resumo (PT): The objective of this work is to compare different strategies for the numerical solution of mathematical models of simulated moving bed (SMB) processes to predict the transient and steady-state behaviour. The mathematical model is based on the true moving bed (TMB) description of SMB processes. The model assumes axial dispersion flow for the liquid phase and plug flow for the solid phase. Intraparticle mass transfer was described in terms of a simple linear driving force (LDF) approximation. The mathematical models for transient situations (TM(-)1 and TM(-)2) can be written in terms of system of partial differential-algebraic equations (PDAEs) or partial differential equations (PDEs), respectively, when the algebraic equation representing the adsorption equilibrium isotherm is inserted into the mass conservation/mass transfer kinetics equations or written as separate equation. Similarly, for steady-state the mathematical models (SSM(-)3 and SSM(-)4) are represented by a system of differential-algebraic equations (DAEs) or ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Different public domain solvers were used to numerically solve the four mathematical models described above. For the transient model TM(-)1 the DASSL solver was used to solve the system of PDAEs and for TM(-)2 the PDECOL package was used to solve the system of PDEs. For the steady-state model, the solvers COLDAE and COLNEW were used to solve the DAEs and ODEs systems, corresponding to the models SSM(-)3 and SSM(-)4, respectively. The glucose/fructose separation was used as a test case in a SMB with a 12 column configuration considering both linear and non-linear isotherms. The study of the effect of the operating conditions on the TMB performance and separation regions was also analysed. For the calculation of steady-state concentration profiles and process performance COLDAE solver is recommended because it requires less computing time and allows working with the adsorption equilibrium isotherm separately permitting easy changes on the algebraic relationship. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Abstract (EN): The objective of this work is to compare different strategies for the numerical solution of mathematical models of simulated moving bed (SMB) processes to predict the transient and steady-state behaviour. The mathematical model is based on the true moving bed (TMB) description of SMB processes. The model assumes axial dispersion flow for the liquid phase and plug flow for the solid phase. Intraparticle mass transfer was described in terms of a simple linear driving force (LDF) approximation. The mathematical models for transient situations (TM(-)1 and TM(-)2) can be written in terms of system of partial differential-algebraic equations (PDAEs) or partial differential equations (PDEs), respectively, when the algebraic equation representing the adsorption equilibrium isotherm is inserted into the mass conservation/mass transfer kinetics equations or written as separate equation. Similarly, for steady-state the mathematical models (SSM(-)3 and SSM(-)4) are represented by a system of differential-algebraic equations (DAEs) or ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Different public domain solvers were used to numerically solve the four mathematical models described above. For the transient model TM(-)1 the DASSL solver was used to solve the system of PDAEs and for TM(-)2 the PDECOL package was used to solve the system of PDEs. For the steady-state model, the solvers COLDAE and COLNEW were used to solve the DAEs and ODEs systems, corresponding to the models SSM(-)3 and SSM(-)4, respectively. The glucose/fructose separation was used as a test case in a SMB with a 12 column configuration considering both linear and non-linear isotherms. The study of the effect of the operating conditions on the TMB performance and separation regions was also analysed. For the calculation of steady-state concentration profiles and process performance COLDAE solver is recommended because it requires less computing time and allows working with the adsorption equilibrium isotherm separately permitting easy changes on the algebraic relationship.
Idioma: Inglês
Tipo (Avaliação Docente): Científica
Contacto: arodrig@fe.up.pt
Nº de páginas: 17
Documentos
Não foi encontrado nenhum documento associado à publicação.
Publicações Relacionadas

Da mesma revista

Untitled - Reply (2002)
Outra Publicação em Revista Científica Internacional
oliveira, p; Costa, L
Letter to the editor (2002)
Outra Publicação em Revista Científica Internacional
cardoso, mf; salcedo, rl; de feyo azevedo, s; barbosa, d; oliveira, p; costa, l
Decision-support challenges in the chemical-pharmaceutical industry: Findings and future research directions (2020)
Outra Publicação em Revista Científica Internacional
Marques, CM; Moniz, S; Jorge Pinho de Sousa; Barbosa Povoa, AP; Reklaitis, G
Variant and invariant states for chemical reaction systems (2015)
Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional
Rodrigues D.; Srinivasan S.; Billeter J.; Bonvin D.

Ver todas (68)

Recomendar Página Voltar ao Topo