Preventive Conservation
Instance: 2020/2021 - 2S
Cycles of Study/Courses
Acronym |
No. of Students |
Study Plan |
Curricular Years |
Credits UCN |
Credits ECTS |
Contact hours |
Total Time |
ARQU |
17 |
ARQU - Study Plan |
2 |
- |
6 |
52 |
162 |
Teaching language
Suitable for English-speaking students
Objectives
To promote the reflexion and the practice, in an integrated and interdisciplinary way, of risk preview, analysis and management, seeking the preservation of archaeological heritage.
To equip the students with methodological tools of work that allow them to research on the subject, to define and to implement plans of action and to sustain decisions.
Learning outcomes and competences
In the end, students are expected to be able to:
1. Correctly define concepts related to intervention in heritage and state their specific objectives and pathways, underlining the importance of damage and loss prevention;
2. Describe and explain the alteration processes of the material support to the archaeological heritage, identifying the agents responsible, according to their specificities;
3. Interpret alteration evidences and investigate its origin;
4. Organize and implement a preventive action plan, as well as estimate its results.
Working method
Presencial
Pre-requirements (prior knowledge) and co-requirements (common knowledge)
Non applicable.
Program
1. Introduction
1.1. Heritage and conservation
1.1.1. Concepts: Genesis and evolution
1.1.2. Management and preservation tools. (Inter)National law
2. Archaeological materials and contexts
2.1. Vulnerabilities/resistances
2.2. Alteration. Agents, interaction mechanisms and evidence
3. Intervention methodologies and domain
3.1. In situ
3.1.1. Lifting and collection methodologies
3.1.2. Packaging and transport
3.2. In laboratory
3.2.1. Handling
3.2.2. Cleaning
3.2.3. Stabilization/Fixation 3.2.4. Marking
3.2.5. Protection
3.3. In storage and exhibition 3.3.1. Packaging
3.3.2. Environmental management
Mandatory literature
PEARSON, C.; The Conservation Of Marine Archaeological Objects, Butterworths, 1987. ISBN: 0-408-10668-9
WATKINSON, D.; First Aid for Finds, Rescue/UKIC, 1987. ISBN: 0903789132
LANG, J. & MIDDLETON, A.; Radiography of Cultural Material, Butterworth-Heinemann, 1997. ISBN: 0-7506-2621-6
ODEGAARD, N.; Material Characterization Tests for Objects of Art and Archaeology, Archetype, 2005. ISBN: 1-904982-09-3
CRONYN, J. M.; The Elements of Archaeological Conservation, Routledge, 1992. ISBN: 0-415-01207-4
RODGERS, B.A.; The Archaeologist’s Manual for Conservation: A Guide to Non-Toxic, Minimal Intervention Artifact Stablization, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2004. ISBN: 0-306-48466-8
STOLOW, N.; Conservation and Exhibitions, Butterworths, 1987. ISBN: 0-408-01434-2
THOMSON, G.; The Museum Environment, Butterworth-Heinemann, 1994. ISBN: 0-7506-2041-2
Pye, E.; Caring for the Past. Issues in Conservation for Archaeology and Museums, James and James, 2001. ISBN: 1-902916-10-7
MUSEUMS & GALLERIES COMMISSION ; Standards in the Museum Care of Archaeological Collections, MGC, 1992. ISBN: 0-948630-15-9
PEARSON, C.; Rock Art and Posterity: Conserving, Managing and Recording Rock Art, Australian Rock Art Research Publication, 1991. ISBN: 0-646-03751-x
Comments from the literature
Throughout the semester, specific references will be provided on the different topics of the program and the development of thematic research.
Teaching methods and learning activities
Theoretical-practical classes, laboratory practices and tutorial orientations. Use of active teaching/learning strategies, such as field activities, laboratory simulation/experimentation and presentation/discussion/education, based on imagined scenarios, real world problems and case studies. Development of individual and group work.
Software
Microsoft Office
keywords
Humanities > Arts > Fine arts > Art works preservation
Humanities > History > Archaeology
Evaluation Type
Distributed evaluation without final exam
Assessment Components
Designation |
Weight (%) |
Apresentação/discussão de um trabalho científico |
30,00 |
Teste |
15,00 |
Trabalho de campo |
12,50 |
Trabalho escrito |
30,00 |
Trabalho laboratorial |
12,50 |
Total: |
100,00 |
Amount of time allocated to each course unit
Designation |
Time (hours) |
Apresentação/discussão de um trabalho científico |
10,00 |
Estudo autónomo |
40,00 |
Frequência das aulas |
54,00 |
Trabalho de campo |
10,00 |
Trabalho escrito |
30,00 |
Trabalho laboratorial |
18,00 |
Total: |
162,00 |
Eligibility for exams
Students must guarantee a frequency of 75%, except in cases provided for in general law and FLUP regulations.
Calculation formula of final grade
The following evaluation elements are considered and weighted:
- Written test, individual (15%);
- Reports of field and laboratory work, group (sum 25%);
- Thematic research and preparation of written work, group (30%);
- Oral presentation and discussion of the theme developed in group (30%).
Examinations or Special Assignments
Students dismissed from the attendance and who didn’t comply with it shall:
- Develop, autonomously, activities which explore the program, after teacher's approval, and write a report about them;
- Elaborate a thematic research work, which the teacher will supervise through the existent communication channels;
- Prepare and present a lesson during the exam period, in a time and place to be set.
Internship work/project
Non applicable.
Special assessment (TE, DA, ...)
According to FLUP regulations.
Classification improvement
The improvement of classification may be made for the following written components:
- Reports of field and laboratory work, group (sum 25%);
- Thematic research and preparation of written work, group (30%).
Observations
All missing situations will be considered and resolved by the teacher, in compliance with the FLUP regulations.
In view of the pandemic context, changes were made to the dynamics of classes and to the assessment, with the following elements of assessment being considered and weighted:
- Individual - Moodle test (30%);
- Group - Thematic research_Oral presentation (35%) + Written document (35%).
The improvement of the classification can be made only to the written component of the group evaluation: Written document (35%).