Multidisciplinary Seminars
| Keywords |
| Classification |
Keyword |
| OFICIAL |
Safety and Hygiene Engineering |
Instance: 2025/2026 - 2S
Cycles of Study/Courses
| Acronym |
No. of Students |
Study Plan |
Curricular Years |
Credits UCN |
Credits ECTS |
Contact hours |
Total Time |
| DEMSSO |
0 |
Syllabus since 2009/10 |
1 |
- |
12 |
84 |
324 |
Teaching Staff - Responsibilities
Teaching language
Suitable for English-speaking students
Objectives
The overall goal is to:
Develop a set of methodological skills that enable each student to circumscribe a topic, identify a problem and define research goals.
The specific objectives include:
• To acquire advanced knowledge on operationalization of the different research paradigms;
• To interiorise a critical and reflective attitude about the information available;
• To develop the ability to identify, assess and formulate problems of occupational safety and health;
• To develope the ability to work in a multidisciplinar and multicultural team.
Learning outcomes and competences
Students should be able to:
• Understand the multidisciplinary nature of occupational safety and health problems and the need for cooperative approaches to solve them.
• To know different perspectives and approaches to the Occupational Safety and Health topics;
• To establish the boundaries of the topic, to identify a problem and define research goals;
• To know the basic criteria for analyzing scientific literature;
• To know how to do a systematic review on a subject.
Working method
Presencial
Program
Brief presentation of the themes of interest of the DemSSO Professors and researchers;
Presentation of the experience and research results of the students of previous editions of DemSSO;
Methodologies to do research in typical data bases and also in other sources out of the ‘mainstream’;
Seminars, round tables and debates with specialized people from different scientific areas;
Students’ visits, interviews and other activities;
Multi and interdisciplinary analyses on Occupational Safety and Health;
Any scale problems identification;
Presentation of research results in conferences, round tables or debates.
Mandatory literature
Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G. Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C. Gøtzsche; John P.A. Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P.J. Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; and David Moher;
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration, 2009
Teaching methods and learning activities
Presentation, discussion and debate of several themes in a holistic perspective in the field of safety, hygiene and health;
Network exchange of knowledge and experiences, conjugating different approaches and attitudes in systemic way;
Peer review of each student’s work by two of his colleagues.
Evaluation Type
Distributed evaluation without final exam
Assessment Components
| Designation |
Weight (%) |
| Defesa pública de dissertação, de relatório de projeto ou estágio, ou de tese |
80,00 |
| Participação presencial |
20,00 |
| Total: |
100,00 |
Amount of time allocated to each course unit
| Designation |
Time (hours) |
| Elaboração de relatório/dissertação/tese |
116,00 |
| Estudo autónomo |
50,00 |
| Frequência das aulas |
108,00 |
| Trabalho de investigação |
50,00 |
| Total: |
324,00 |
Eligibility for exams
According to FEUP rules.
Calculation formula of final grade
Final report of each student (50%),
Students’ presentations during the semester (20%),
Written and oral reviewing done along and at the end of the semester (20%),
Students’ participation in the debates and cooperation of each student with their colleagues (10%).
Examinations or Special Assignments
Not applicable.
Special assessment (TE, DA, ...)
Not applied
Classification improvement
Not applied