Academic Spinoff: From the Lab to the Market
Keywords |
Classification |
Keyword |
CNAEF |
Engineering and related techniques |
Instance: 2024/2025 - 1S (of 07-10-2024 to 22-11-2024) 
Cycles of Study/Courses
Acronym |
No. of Students |
Study Plan |
Curricular Years |
Credits UCN |
Credits ECTS |
Contact hours |
Total Time |
M.BIO |
4 |
Syllabus |
1 |
- |
1,5 |
12 |
40,5 |
MEB |
0 |
Syllabus |
1 |
- |
1,5 |
12 |
40,5 |
M.EIC |
6 |
Syllabus |
2 |
- |
1,5 |
12 |
40,5 |
M.EM |
8 |
Syllabus |
1 |
- |
1,5 |
12 |
40,5 |
M.IA |
0 |
Syllabus |
1 |
- |
1,5 |
12 |
40,5 |
2 |
SALM |
0 |
Syllabus |
1 |
- |
1,5 |
12 |
40,5 |
Teaching Staff - Responsibilities
Teaching language
Portuguese and english
Objectives
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
- explain the concept of start-up and academic spin-off
- identify and discuss opportunities for valorising ideas
- demonstrate the market potential of a technology or research result
- select the appropriate profiles for setting up a technological start-up
- design a plan for setting up an academic spin-off
Learning outcomes and competences
COMPETENCIES (EntreComp-The European Entrepreneurship Competence Framework. EU, 2018)
- Spotting Opportunities & Valuing ideas
- Mobilising resources
- Planning & management
Working method
Presencial
Program
- Introduction to the concept of start-ups and academic spinoffs
- From student to founder.
- Team, roles and responsibilities.
- Intellectual property.
- How to draw up the roadmap for setting up a start-up.
Mandatory literature
Don Rose, Cam Patterson; Research to Revenue: A Practical Guide to University Start-Ups, The University of North Carolina Press, 2023. ISBN: 978-1-4696-7677-7
Tony Fadell; Build: An Unorthodox Guide to Making Things Worth Making, HarperCollins Publishers, 2022. ISBN: 978-0-0630-4606-1
Steve Blank, Bob Dorf; The Startup Owner's Manual: The Step-By-Step Guide for Building a Great Company, K & S Ranch, 2020. ISBN: 978-1-119-69068-9
Teaching methods and learning activities
TEACHING METHODS
The teaching-learning method has a lecture component based on guest lectures on specific topics and a work component in which students develop, in groups and collaboratively, the plan for setting up an academic spin-off.
ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
- modality: distributed without final exam
- components: intermediate progress reports (2), work report and individual presentation
- formula for calculating the final mark: 50% reports + 30% presentation + 20% participation
- scale: in accordance with UPorto's assessment regulations, the final grade will be expressed on a scale of zero to twenty. To pass, the student must obtain a minimum mark of 8 in the components and a minimum final mark of 10.
Evaluation Type
Distributed evaluation without final exam
Assessment Components
Designation |
Weight (%) |
Participação presencial |
20,00 |
Apresentação/discussão de um trabalho científico |
30,00 |
Trabalho prático ou de projeto |
50,00 |
Total: |
100,00 |
Amount of time allocated to each course unit
Designation |
Time (hours) |
Elaboração de projeto |
20,00 |
Estudo autónomo |
8,50 |
Frequência das aulas |
12,00 |
Total: |
40,50 |
Eligibility for exams
Students have to actively participate in the development of projects. Besides they cannot miss more classes than allowed by the rules.
Calculation formula of final grade
- components: intermediate progress reports (2), work report and individual presentation
- formula for calculating the final grade: 50% reports + 30% presentation + 20% participation
Special assessment (TE, DA, ...)
It is the same as for ordinary students.
Classification improvement
Students can only improve their marks in the following year by doing a new project, since this course unit does not comprise a final exam.