Go to:
Logótipo
You are here: Start > Publications > View > Automatic counting the number of Collembola in digital images
BIN@Porto 2024
Publication

Automatic counting the number of Collembola in digital images

Title
Automatic counting the number of Collembola in digital images
Type
Article in International Conference Proceedings Book
Year
2011
Authors
Caridade, CMR
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. View Authenticus page Without ORCID
Marcal, ARS
(Author)
FCUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page View ORCID page
Mendonca, T
(Author)
FCUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page View ORCID page
Natal Da Luz, T
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. View Authenticus page Without ORCID
Sousa, JP
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. View Authenticus page Without ORCID
Conference proceedings International
Pages: 1837-1841
4th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, CISP 2011
Shanghai, 15 October 2011 through 17 October 2011
Indexing
Publicação em ISI Web of Knowledge ISI Web of Knowledge
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-008-1W1
Abstract (EN): Counting the number of Collembola in digital images is a routine task in laboratories of soil ecotoxicology. This process is based on a direct visual identification of Collembola, and is consequently a time consuming task. This paper present a fully automatic system for counting the number of Collembola in digital images. The system selects the interest area of the image, detects and removes the specular reflection of the incident light, as well as the foam developed during laboratory experiment and finally identifies and counts the number of Collembola. The system performance was tested using 5 treatments with 9 or 10 replicates and 13 treatments with 4 or 5 replicates. A total of 111 images were tested and the results were compared with those obtained by manual identification. The average relative error between automatic and manual counts from multiple observations of the same treatment was 2:1%, which can be considered a good result, given that this value is below the standard deviation between multiple replicate counts. © 2011 IEEE.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
No. of pages: 5
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2024 © Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Accessibility  I Index A-Z  I Guest Book
Page generated on: 2024-10-02 at 03:52:48 | Acceptable Use Policy | Data Protection Policy | Complaint Portal