Code: | EA0031 | Acronym: | DA |
Keywords | |
---|---|
Classification | Keyword |
OFICIAL | Environmental Sciences |
Active? | Yes |
Responsible unit: | Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering |
Course/CS Responsible: | Master in Environmental Engineering |
Acronym | No. of Students | Study Plan | Curricular Years | Credits UCN | Credits ECTS | Contact hours | Total Time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIEA | 36 | Syllabus since 2006/07 | 3 | - | 6 | 56 | 162 |
Background: the environmental engineer needs to make use of scientific tools in order to assess the impact associated to products, services and functions. Several analytical and procedures tools exists and are supporting the environmental decision making. Several currently used tools to assess impacts regarding the use of natural resources, the emission of pollution and the costs associated to the options used to mitigate pollution are presented to the students. More specifically, regarding the the tools objectives, methods, the strong and weak points, the results obtained and tools limitations.
Specific aims: knowledge in environmental decision tools together with the ability of using them in the design of solutions to solve environmental problems and in the forecast and prevention of those problems, including counterproductive effects in any environmental domain. The students apply the tools to current activities or products throughout the assignments.
Other aims include, the analysis with uncertainty, the solution and recommendation, the hypothesis formulation, systems thinking and the holistical approach is trained, prioritization and focus tradeoffs, judgment and balance in resolution. Develop personal and interrelationship skills through group assignments, reporting and presentations in oral communication.
Learning outcomes: students at the end shall be able to:
i) recognize and compare the specificities of the different tools and are able to applied them in order to assess specific environmental problems,
ii) distinguish between tools and identify the advantages of a simultaneous utilization of tools,
iii) be capable of using the tools in the design, implementation and operation of environmental systems.
Previous knowledge: basic courses in environmental management of air pollution, water pollution and wastes management and natural resources conservation. Also in decision methods.
Introduction to environmental decision support tools The various analytical tools for environmental decision: life cycle assessment, cost-effectiveness analysis, sensitivity analysis, environmental performance evaluation, material and substance flow analysis, ecological footprint, water footprint and carbon footprint.
Tools typology: comparative analysis. Tool selection depending on the objective and field of study; methodology; tool result or “product”; strengths and weaknesses and examples. Use of tools in the assessment of environmental problems.
Theoretical-practical classes (tutorial): presentation of course unit themes. The presentation will be, whenever possible, illustrated by case studies examples. Theoretical-practical classes: execution of bibliography research assignments with presentation and discussion. Execution of a practical assignment using tools in order to assess environmental problems along with the elaboration of conclusions which may help environmental decision making.
Designation | Weight (%) |
---|---|
Exame | 40,00 |
Trabalho escrito | 60,00 |
Total: | 100,00 |
According to General Evaluation Rules of FEUP.
Comments: - Students have to reach a minimum grade of 8 out of 20 in the final exam. - Students have to reach a minimum grade of 8 out 20 in the assignments (A1 and A2).
Practical assignments (FG1) and final exam (FG2).
Final Grade (FG) will be based on the grade of both components (FG=0.6FG1+0.4FG2).
FG1 = (Assignment 1 – 50%) + (Assignment 2 – 50%)
FG2= Grade of the exam
Practical assignments (FG1) and final exam (FG2).
Final Grade (FG) will be based on the grade of both components (FG=0.6FG1+0.4FG2).
FG1 = (Assignment 1)
FG2= Grade of the exam
Each students have to reach a minimum grade of 8 out of 20 in the final exam.
Final Grade (FG) will be based on the grade of both components (FG=0.6FG1+0.4FG2).
FG1 = (Assignment 1)
FG2= Grade of the exam
Each students have to reach a minimum grade of 8 out of 20 in the final exam.
Students can only improve the grade of the final exam and not the continuous assessment component (assignments). Students have to attend an exam at the appropriate season to improve their grades.