|Responsible unit:||Department of Informatics Engineering|
|Course/CS Responsible:||Master in Informatics and Computing Engineering|
|Acronym||No. of Students||Study Plan||Curricular Years||Credits UCN||Credits ECTS||Contact hours||Total Time|
|MIEIC||94||Syllabus since 2009/2010||5||-||30||14||810|
|Luís Filipe Pinto de Almeida Teixeira|
|Maria Teresa Magalhães da Silva Pinto de Andrade||1,00|
|Ana Paula Cunha da Rocha||1,75|
|Vera Lucia Miguéis Oliveira e Silva||1,00|
|António Fernando Vasconcelos Cunha Castro Coelho||0,75|
|Eduardo Miguel Campos Magalhães||0,25|
|Rui Pedro Amaral Rodrigues||0,50|
|Hugo José Sereno Lopes Ferreira||2,50|
|Henrique Daniel de Avelar Lopes Cardoso||1,00|
|Armando Jorge Miranda de Sousa||1,00|
|Ana Cristina Ramada Paiva||2,00|
|Eugénio da Costa Oliveira||0,50|
|Luís Filipe Pinto de Almeida Teixeira||1,75|
|Rosaldo José Fernandes Rossetti||2,00|
|Carla Alexandra Teixeira Lopes||1,00|
|Ricardo Santos Morla||0,50|
|Filipe Alexandre Pais de Figueiredo Correia||0,50|
|Miguel Fernando Paiva Velhote Correia||0,50|
|João Tiago Pinheiro Neto Jacob||0,50|
|Nuno Honório Rodrigues Flores||0,50|
|Rui Pedro da Silva Nóbrega||0,75|
|José Manuel de Magalhães Cruz||0,50|
|Jaime dos Santos Cardoso||1,00|
|João António Correia Lopes||0,25|
|João Pedro Carvalho Leal Mendes Moreira||1,75|
|Carlos Manuel Milheiro de Oliveira Pinto Soares||0,75|
|Bruno Miguel Carvalhido Lima||0,25|
|Manuel Alberto Pereira Ricardo||0,25|
|António Miguel Pontes Pimenta Monteiro||2,50|
|Daniel Augusto Gama de Castro Silva||1,50|
|João Carlos Pascoal Faria||0,75|
|Liliana da Silva Ferreira||0,50|
|Rui Carlos Camacho de Sousa Ferreira da Silva||2,25|
|Maria Cristina de Carvalho Alves Ribeiro||0,25|
|Luís António Pereira de Meneses Corte-Real||0,25|
|Ademar Manuel Teixeira de Aguiar||0,50|
|Maria Teresa Galvão Dias||0,75|
1-BACKGROUND In accordance with the procedure defined in the specific rules of FEUP, Dissertation characterization is as follows: • Individual work of research and development, leading to the development of a scientific dissertation on a theme under the knowledge of the MIEIC programme towards integration and application to complex problem solving engineering knowledge, skills and attitudes acquired throughout the above graduation years. • Can be a work of research or technological development and implementation, involving experimental media and/or simulation, which promotes the development of capacities for decision-making, initiative, innovation, creative and critical thinking, in a context of individual or group work. • Must involve the analysis of new situations, the collection of relevant information, the development and selection or design of a methodology and approach of the proposed problem resolution tools, their resolution, the exercise of synthesis and preparation of conclusions, as well as the preparation of a relevant dissertation, subject to public presentation and discussion of results. • Can be accomplished in an academic or in an enterprise and academic environment. In this case the objectives, nature and monitoring form should be object of prior agreement between the student and the College's advisors and the company, validated by the course Director, guaranteeing the satisfaction of scientific objectives and pedagogical curriculum unit, and protecting any issues of confidentiality on the part of the host institution/company. 2-SPECIFIC GOALS • Promoting the development of capacities for decision-making, initiative, innovation, creative and critical thinking, in a context of individual work. • Individual work-research and development; • Write a scientific dissertation. 3-PRIOR KNOWLEDGE • Technological knowledge in the area of MIEIC, • Knowledge, skills and attitudes acquired throughout the above years in MIEIC. 4-PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION • Scientific Component: 40% to 60% • Technological Component to 40 60% 5-LEARNING OUTCOMES At the end of the curriculum unit, students must demonstrate ability to: • Analysis of new situations with collection of relevant information; • Development and selection, or definition of methodologies and instruments to solve the proposed problem; • Problem solving, with the consequent exercise of synthesis and preparation of conclusions; • Preparation of a relevant dissertation to be subject to a public presentation and discussion of results.
Individual work on research and development, leading to the production of a
scientific dissertation on a subject in the area of knowledge of the course, or
to integrate and apply knowledge, skills and attitudes acquired during the
course to solving complex problems of engineering.
The work can be research type or technological development and
application, involving experimental media and/or simulation, and should
promote skills on building initiative, decision-making, innovation, creative
and critical thinking.
• Identification of a problem to be solved • Survey of State-of-the-art respective • Analysis of potential solutions • Development of a solution • Evaluation of the developed solution • Dissertation report writing
Individual work of research and development, held either in academic or academic/enterprise environment. In this case the objectives, nature and monitoring form should be object of a prior agreement and of a permanent monitoring through meetings between the student, the supervisor from FEUP and the responsible for monitoring of the work in the company.
|Defesa pública de dissertação, de relatório de projeto ou estágio, ou de tese||100,00|
Having a significant work finished, as well as the correspondent dissertation report.
The assessment to be carried out by the jury, depends on the components Work, Report and Public Presentation in accordance with: CL = 50%.TD + 30%.R + 20%.AP Topics to be considered for the evaluation of each of the components TD – EVALUATION OF THE WORK DONE: • Student-autonomy • Difficulty of work proposed • Depth-of work performed • Relevance/impact, in the institutions, evaluating the results obtained • Working Method • Volume and quality of work produced • Student integration-working groups R – DISSERTATION: EVALUATION REPORT • Critical analysis of the State of the art and of work • Structure and logical development • Proper use of figures, algorithms and other illustrations • Summary, introduction and conclusion- • Document global Presentation- • Citations and references • Spelling and other aspects of grammar AP – ASSESSMENT OF PUBLIC PRESENTATION: • Work and results presentation- • Presentation content and organization • Professionalism and posture • Discussion • Level of safety and confidence in answers • Level of knowledge demonstrated
Identical to regular students.
According to the UPorto rules, dissertation grade is not permitted to be improved ("Regulamento geral para avaliação dos discentes de primeiros ciclos, de ciclos de estudos integrados de mestrado e de segundos ciclos da U.Porto).