| Code: | PDMD017 | Acronym: | MI |
| Keywords | |
|---|---|
| Classification | Keyword |
| OFICIAL | Communication Sciences |
| Active? | Yes |
| Web Page: | https://moodle.fe.up.pt/1213/course/view.php?id=97 |
| Responsible unit: | Department of Informatics Engineering |
| Course/CS Responsible: | Doctoral Program in Digital Media |
| Acronym | No. of Students | Study Plan | Curricular Years | Credits UCN | Credits ECTS | Contact hours | Total Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDMD | 11 | Syllabus since 2009/2010 | 1 | - | 7,5 | 42 | 202,5 |
This course has two main goals:
1. Use research methodologies in order to solve scientific problems:
2. Prepare a dissertation proposal:
At the end of this course the students should be able to do:
One expects, in particular, that the students are able to elaborate their thesis proposal with particular focus on structuring the methodological component of it.
1- Introduction to research
2- Ethics in research
3- Basic structure of a research project
4- Research characterization concerning the method: qualitative and quantitative
5- Research classification concerning the purpose: basic research, apllied research, evaluation research, research and development and research-action
6- Method combination: exploratory studies and methodological triangulation
7- Research related to the several specialized areas of the Doctoral Program in Digital Media.
8- Strategies for an accurate selection of bibliography sources
9- Techniques and tools of data collection
10- Techniques of data analysis
11- Basic mechanisms of academic writing
The recommended bibliography description may be found at the subject's Moodle page.
| Designation | Weight (%) |
|---|---|
| Participação presencial | 5,00 |
| Teste | 15,00 |
| Trabalho escrito | 80,00 |
| Total: | 100,00 |
2/3 attendance rate. Some absences may be compensated with virtual participations.
Evaluation will comprehend formative and continuous components, mixing flexible parameters with more “conventional” ones, such as a test. There will be self-evaluation and hetero-evaluation moments at the developed assignment presentations. The subject teachers will arbitrate, moderate and guarantee good judgement and transparency. In every case, the students activities are typically marked by four criteria:
a) Scientific accuracy.
b) Creativity/originality.
c) Clarity.
d) Commitment/presentation.
In addition to the tasks, a relatively short theoretical test will take place with a group of open questions (the student chooses two in three). On a 0 to 20 scale, the final grade will be as according:
A- Formative, continuous evaluation
B- Evaluation of the completed tasks: I) – bibliographic revision assignment; II) - methodological exploration, III) - thesis proposal (with particular focus on methodological component).
C- Final written test.
Distribution:
A- 5%
B- 80% (I- 20% + II - 30% + III - 30%)
C- 15%
Each students' final grade will be: 0,05 X A + 0,8 X B + 0,15 x C
As per the ones described in FEUP. Exceptions may be considered in each case.
No final exam. The final grade improvement will have to be a submitted research proposal presentation, with theme and structure to be discussed with the course teachers.