Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > Predicting argument density from multiple annotations
Publication

Predicting argument density from multiple annotations

Title
Predicting argument density from multiple annotations
Type
Article in International Conference Proceedings Book
Year
2022
Authors
Rocha, Gil
(Author)
Other
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Leite, Bernardo
(Author)
Other
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Carvalho, Paula
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Martins, Bruno
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Won, Miguel
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Conference proceedings International
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-00W-RH0
Resumo (PT):
Abstract (EN): Annotating a corpus with argument structures is a complex task, and it is even more challenging when addressing text genres where argumentative discourse markers do not abound. We explore a corpus of opinion articles annotated by multiple annotators, providing diverse perspectives of the argumentative content therein. New annotation aggregation methods are explored, diverging from the traditional ones that try to minimize presumed errors from annotator disagreement. The impact of our methods is assessed for the task of argument density prediction, seen as an initial step in the argument mining pipeline. We evaluate and compare models trained for this regression task in different generated datasets, considering their prediction error and also from a ranking perspective. Results confirm the expectation that addressing argument density from a ranking perspective is more promising than looking at the problem as a mere regression task. We also show that probabilistic aggregation, which weighs tokens by considering all annotators, is a more interesting approach, achieving encouraging results as it accommodates different annotator perspectives. The code and models are publicly available at https://github.com/DARGMINTS/argument-density.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2024 © Reitoria da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z  I Guest Book
Page created on: 2024-11-09 08:55:35 | Acceptable Use Policy | Data Protection Policy | Complaint Portal