| Code: | LPSI312 | Acronym: | PE |
| Keywords | |
|---|---|
| Classification | Keyword |
| OFICIAL | Psychology |
| Active? | Yes |
| Responsible unit: | Psychology |
| Course/CS Responsible: | First degree in Psychology |
| Acronym | No. of Students | Study Plan | Curricular Years | Credits UCN | Credits ECTS | Contact hours | Total Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPSIC | 36 | Official Curricular Structure | 3 | - | 3 | 27 | 81 |
| Teacher | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Cidália Maria Neves Duarte |
| Theoretical and practical : | 2,00 |
| Type | Teacher | Classes | Hour |
|---|---|---|---|
| Theoretical and practical | Totals | 1 | 2,00 |
| Cidália Maria Neves Duarte | 2,00 |
This CU seeks to raise awareness and consolidate students' knowledge by a relatively new area of psychology, especially given his relationship with other domains of knowledge. We refer to issues concerning the built environment and built by man, the questions of urbanism and its influence / impact on whether or not promotion of human development and their psychological well-being. The possibility to observe, reflect and discuss real situations, whether about experiences in single-family’s spaces, institutional spaces, or the participation and experience in construction and enjoyment of public spaces, allows students to empower themselves to raise awareness (and intervention) in this specific field, deepening a central theme in the lives of individuals - their intimate, social, public and community spaces - where they necessarily and obligatory, live and experience through life cycle.
- Historical perspective of the relationship between architecture, urban planning and psychology.- The environment as an area producer of psychological development, theories and effects of urban life, physical settings, social-economic and political factors;- Concepts of living space, personal space, public space, location, unique ambience: the relationships between visible and invisible factors of space and the bidirectional relationships person-environment: concepts of affordance, perception environmental, socio-spatial behavior; reflections on issues of symbolic and affective person-environment relationship; place attachmente concept;- The role of Community Psychology (sense of belonging, neighborhood, participation and joint management with spaces) to the emergence of psychological illness;- The concept of participative projects and the need of multidisciplinary teams (architects, planners and psychologists).- The possibilities of intervention of the psychologist in this field: the study of person-environment relationship(s) as a means of promoting psychological well-being
- Historical perspective about the relations beteewn psychology, architecture and urbanism.
- Natural and built environments: physical settings, economic, political and social factors.
-Concepts of Proxemics, living space, personal space, public space, the concepts of affordance, environmental perception, symbolic and affective issues of the person-environment relationship; concept of attachment to place; between others.
- The role of Community Psychology (sense of belonging and neighborhood, participation, and articulation with space management);
- Participatory design and multidisciplinary teams (psychologists, architects, urban planners, sociologists,...).
- The possibilities for psychologists to work: the study of the person-environment(s) relationship as a way of promoting psychological well-being
Presentation and discussion of the syllabus encouraging the active participation of students;- Discussion and deepening of specific cases operationalized in many areas, including social housing, community intervention in public spaces, institutions and others,...- Contact with intervention programs such as urban regeneration, whether domestic or foreign, and its implications for living people, and their participation in their conceptualization;- Contact with psychologists and other professionals who have issues related to the research and intervention in this area;- Presentation by students of a work to be discussed within the group;The evaluation is based on the performance of a field work using various methodologies.
| designation | Weight (%) |
|---|---|
| Participação presencial | 25,00 |
| Prova oral | 25,00 |
| Trabalho de campo | 25,00 |
| Trabalho escrito | 25,00 |
| Total: | 100,00 |
| designation | Time (hours) |
|---|---|
| Estudo autónomo | 24,00 |
| Frequência das aulas | 27,00 |
| Trabalho de campo | 15,00 |
| Trabalho escrito | 15,00 |
| Total: | 81,00 |
Terms of frequency: It is recommended effective presence of the students in 3/4 of the practical lessons given. To be aproved the student must obtain a minimum of 10 points out of 20, and each of the components of the distributed evaluation must have a minimun of 9 points out of 20 . Distributed evaluation includes the presence on classes, the field work, the presentation and discussion ok a work about a topic related in classes and it is also requested a paper with a) the identification of the main content, b) the objectives to be achieved and c) the bibliography consulted. All the components of the distributed evaluation must be organized in small groups (2 a 3 elements each). The final classification results from the arithmetical mean of both quotations and will be expressed in a 0-20 scale.
Formula Evaluation: Evaluation is distributed and the final classification results from the arithmetical mean the several quotations of each component and will be expressed in a 0-20 scale