| Code: | DE125 | Acronym: | FEGAE |
| Keywords | |
|---|---|
| Classification | Keyword |
| OFICIAL | Educational Sciences |
| Active? | Yes |
| Responsible unit: | Education Sciences |
| Course/CS Responsible: | Master Degree in Educational Sciences |
| Acronym | No. of Students | Study Plan | Curricular Years | Credits UCN | Credits ECTS | Contact hours | Total Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCED | 11 | Official Curricular Structure | 1 | - | 6 | 49 | 162 |
The main objective is to approach meanings of critical reflection that have been held in the most different epistemological fields related to the area of administration and educational management.
It is about (i) thinking and problematizing epistemological and educational processes; (ii) to know and develop processes of autonomy and democratic governance; (iii) develop projects in the fields of administration, management and educational leaderships, and foster the creation of critical and supportive moments of cooperation, reflection and debate that favor:
This program addresses issues related to theories, conceptions, epistemological models and practices of school administration and management based on the understanding of the socio-organizational characteristics of the State, the educational system and the school. The study of these processes aims to develop and to base a more heuristic and dialectical epistemological conception of administration of educational organizations (as theory and practice) considering the structural specificity and complexity of these and to critically perceive the function and necessity of the models and processes of management and administration of the Organizations as systems of regulation and or emancipation.
Learning outcomes
No prerequisites.The contents of this curricular unit will have to take into account the profile and the interests of the students who sought the mastership of the master's degree in which this unit fits, although there is a set of reference problems that allow to mark both the training work that takes place in the And to support the process of exploiting the above-mentioned interests. In this perspective, it is part of a heuristic way of problematizing and enunciating studies and is structured in a critical educational intentionality based on the contributions of three theoretical axes and their thematic sub-areas: (i) Paradigms and Cognitions in Administration, (ii) Epistemologies in Management And Administration and (iii) Epistemological Foundations in Autonomy and Educational Administration.
PROGRAM:
In short, these are the paradigmatic contents that serve as reference to the configuration of the curricular unit. These are contents that relate to some of the concrete challenges facing schools, which will also serve as a pretext for developing a broader reflection on the historical, political and educational epoch in which we live, in Insofar as it is not possible to dissociate those contents from the vicissitudes and configurations of the same time and its dynamics.
Bibliography
Antunes, Fátima & Sá, Virgínio (2010). Públicos Escolares e Regulação da Educação: Lutas concorrenciais na arena educativa. Vila Nova de Gaia: Fundação Manuel Leão.
Boavida, João, Amado, João (2008). Ciências da educação : epistemologia, identidade e perspectivas. 2ª ed . Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, 2008. ISBN 978-989-8074-63-8.
Barroso, João (org.) (2006). A Regulação das Políticas Públicas de Educação. Lisboa: Educa.
Barroso, João (1996). O estudo da escola. Porto: Porto Editora.
Bates, Richard (2006). Educational administration and social justice. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, vol. 1(2), pp. 141-156.
Brassard, André (2000). L’institutionnalisation du champ d’études de l’administration de l’éducation. Revue Française de Pédagogie, n. 130, pp. 15-28.
Bush, Tony (2003). Theories of Educational Leadership and Management. London: Sage.
Correia, José A. (1998). Para uma teoria crítica em educação: Contributos para uma recientificação do campo educativo. Porto: Porto Editora.
Costa, Jorge A.; Neto-Mendes, António; Ventura, Alexandre (2007). A assessoria na educação em debate. Universidade de Aveiro, 2007.
Estêvão, Carlos V. (2004). Educação, justiça e autonomia. Porto: Asa Editores.
Evers, Colin & Lakomsky, Grabriele (2000). Doing Educational Administration - A theory of administrative practice. Amsterdam: Pergamon Press.
Ferreira, Elisabete (2017). Em volta do governo das escolas as autonomias são credíveis? In Lima, Licínio, Sá, Virgílio, orgs. (2017). O governo das escolas - Democracia, controlo e performatividade. Braga: Edições Húmus. ISBN 978-989-755-265-6
Ferreira, Elisabete, Correia, José Alberto, & Lopes, Adélia (2015). Repensar as lideranças escolares em questões de aprendizagem e equidade. Revista Lusófona de Educação, 30, 59-72.
Ferreira, Elisabete (2012). (D)enunciar a autonomia. Contributos para a compreensão da génese e da construção da autonomia escolar. Porto: Porto Editora.
Freire, Paulo (1997). Pedagogia da autonomia. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
Griffiths, Daniel (1979). Intellectual turmoil in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, n. 15, vol. 3, pp. 45-65.
Lima, Licínio C. (2007). Administração da educação e autonomia das escolas. In Conselho Nacional de Educação. A educação em Portugal (1986-2006). Lisboa: CNE.
Lima, Licinio C. (2001). A escola como organização educativa: uma abordagem sociológica. São Paulo: Cortez.
Morgan, Gareth (1989). Images de l.organisation. Québec : Les Presses de l’Université Laval.
Nóvoa, António S. (org.) (1992). As Organizações Escolares em Análise. Lisboa: Publicações Dom Quixote.
Paro, Vítor H. (1988). Administração escolar. Introdução crítica. 3ª ed. São Paulo: Cortez.
Trindade, Rui (2009). Escola, Poder e Saber: a acção pedagógica em debate. Porto: Livpsic.
| designation | Weight (%) |
|---|---|
| Participação presencial | 10,00 |
| Trabalho escrito | 90,00 |
| Total: | 100,00 |
| designation | Time (hours) |
|---|---|
| Estudo autónomo | 113,00 |
| Frequência das aulas | 49,00 |
| Total: | 162,00 |
The legal requirements are met for ordinary students or holders of a special status. The evaluation method adopted is the distributed evaluation without a final exam, guaranteed at a frequency of 75% of the classes given. Following the principles of this modality the evaluation of this training component contemplates:
The evaluation Type is "Distribution without final exam" constituted by the following components:
- Active participation in class - 10%
- Time for individual formal evaluation, written synthesis - 90%
In case the student fails in one of the planned evaluation components will have to reformulate the component in question. The assessment below 8 values per assessment component is considered insufficient. The final classification awarded will be expressed in a scale of 0 to 20 values.
Not foreseen.Not foreseen.It can be carried out according to the legislation in a final exam.