| Code: | P404 | Acronym: | EDP |
| Keywords | |
|---|---|
| Classification | Keyword |
| OFICIAL | Social and Human Sciences |
| Active? | Yes |
| Web Page: | http://moodle.up.pt/course/view.php?id=808 |
| Responsible unit: | Psychology |
| Course/CS Responsible: | Integrated Master Psychology |
| Acronym | No. of Students | Study Plan | Curricular Years | Credits UCN | Credits ECTS | Contact hours | Total Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIPSI | 164 | Official Curricular Structure | 1 | - | 3 | 30 | 81 |
To make students able to:
1. Identify, recognize and critically reflect the politic, axiologic, ethic and deontological dimensions of psychology, as science and profession, emphasizing psychology professional practices.
2. Differentiate ethic and deontology as regulatory dimensions of the professional practice of psychology considering structures (principles) and processes (norms/rules).
3. Integrate the structuring ethic, axiologic and deontological elements of the psychologist professional culture.
4. Understand and critically appreciate normative documents of the psychologist profession, namely the Portuguese Psychologists' Ethics Code.
5. Mobilize ethic principles and values and deontological norms and rules in specific situations and contexts in which is performed the professional role of psychologist.
6. Recognize the importance of the things learned about ethics and deontology by applying it to/in the immediate context of their education as students of psychology.
At the end of the curricular unit, students should be able to:
1. Identify, recognize and critically reflect the politic, axiologic, ethic and deontological dimensions of psychology, as science and profession, emphasizing psychology professional practices.
2. Differentiate ethic and deontology as regulatory dimensions of the professional practice of psychology considering structures (principles) and processes (norms/rules).
3. Integrate the structuring ethic, axiologic and deontological elements of the psychologist professional culture.
4. Understand and critically appreciate normative documents of the psychologist profession, namely the Portuguese Psychologists' Ethics Code, identifying from it, quality patterns of the psychology practice.
5. Mobilize ethic principles and values and deontological norms and rules in specific situations and contexts in which is performed the professional role of psychologist.
6. Recognize the importance of the things learned about ethics and deontology by applying it to/in the immediate context of their education as students of psychology
1. Philosophic and psychological frame of the ethical dimension of human action; clarification of “professional ethic” and “professional deontology” concepts; characterization of the psychologist profession.
2. Nature of the ethical and axiological compromises of the psychologist and of the interest conflicts; ethic, deontology, culture and politics in psychological intervention and research.
3. Defining groups of problems and population groups especially relevant to a reflexive learning about the ethic and deontologic skilled professional practice.
4. Ethic and deontologic implications of the psychologist profession organization and of its regulation and access.
5. Presentation and discussion of ethic-deontological problems/dilemmas associated to the professional practice of psychology and, more immediately, to situations relating to the students behavior during the training process in the academic environment.
Small groups of students will be involved in the construction and/or reserach, analysis and discussion of dilemmas associated with the practice of psychological intervention and research. The issues of psychological intervention and research ethics will be approached considering students' level of training and introducing, where appropriate and useful, topics that make them more sensitive to the accomplishment of ethic principles even during their training process (e.g., how to manage appropriately interpersonal relations with peers and third persons, the need to respect copyright and author property in any academic work they will develop, on so on). The exploration of the professional dilemmas presupposes, on the one hand, the use of the Code of Ethics of Portuguese Psychologists and, on the other hand, students' reflective judjment of students with respect to the situations involved in the dilemma.The subjet of academic integrity/fraud will be explored using relevant UP documents that can help students to understand and cope with different aspects of living and behaving in the academic environment. The UC works will be developed inside and outside the classroom contact times. Professionals from specific areas of Psychology will be invited to classes in order to reflect and/or share experiences about the ethic framework of their research/intervention practices.
| designation | Weight (%) |
|---|---|
| Defesa pública de dissertação, de relatório de projeto ou estágio, ou de tese | 25,00 |
| Trabalho de campo | 40,00 |
| Trabalho escrito | 35,00 |
| Total: | 100,00 |
| designation | Time (hours) |
|---|---|
| Elaboração de relatório/dissertação/tese | 15,00 |
| Estudo autónomo | 15,00 |
| Frequência das aulas | 26,00 |
| Trabalho de investigação | 25,00 |
| Total: | 81,00 |
Student's must achieve at least grade 10 in final grade. Each student should be able to be assessed with respect to the three individual components of the distributed evaluation and must obtain a minimum grade of 8 in each one of them.
Students’ final grade will be estimated considering three components:
1. Quality of the group performance in the design and implementation of the research work (40%);
- The research work shoud approach, with an exploratory aim, ethical and deontological issues associated to the performace of the psychologist role and/or ethical aspects related to the student role (academic integrity or fraud).
2. Quality of the group performance in the oral/public presentation of the research work developed - both process and results (25%);
3. Quality of the text inidividually written by each student group about the content of the vignettes used in the research by their respetive groups (35%).
All grades will be expressed on a scale from 0 to 20.
Non applicable
Students in this condition (those who benefits from class dismiss) are subject to the same plan of ativities plan, assessement and grade improvement system of the other students.
For final grade improvement or for 2nd chance evaluation, students should develop a writen individual work about a particular subject to be defined by the professor from which it will be assigned to the student a new global grade.