| Code: | P813 | Acronym: | ISRR |
| Keywords | |
|---|---|
| Classification | Keyword |
| OFICIAL | Psychology |
| Active? | Yes |
| Responsible unit: | Psychology |
| Course/CS Responsible: | Integrated Master Psychology |
| Acronym | No. of Students | Study Plan | Curricular Years | Credits UCN | Credits ECTS | Contact hours | Total Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIPSI | 22 | Official Curricular Structure | 4 | - | 6 | 54 | 162 |
| MTP | 13 | Official Curricular Structure | 1 | - | 6 | 54 | 162 |
1. To know and understand what harm reduction is and its importance. 2. To distinguish social intervention and harm reduction from similar forms of intervention (communitary intervention, health education...). 3. To know the different areas, methods and strategies used in drug use and sex work' s harm reduction. 4. Based on good practices examples, identify, characterise and critically discuss other projects and programs. 5. To apply acquired knoledge to concrete situations and contexts
At the end of the course, students should be able to:
- Know and understand the meaning of harm reduction and its importance
- Know the different areas, methods and strategies associated with drug use and sex work' s harm reduction
- Identify, characterize and critically discuss different harm reduction programs and intervention projects
1.
1.1 Critical discussion of the concept of "risk": psychological risk, social risk, risks management, risk society,...
1.2. The context of social intervention and harm reduction: marginality and exclusion at the pos-industrial city; Drug phenomenum social evolution and the emergence of harm reduction.
2. Harm reduction notions, initial programs critics and principles. Harm reduction in the global strategy of drug intervention.
3. Harm reduction in Portugal
4. Main characteristics and programs:
4.1. Characteristics: pragmatism, proximity, network,...
4.2. Programs: drug use/drugdependence (syringe exchange, low threshold methadone programs, harm reduction in the sintetic drugs scene, consumption rooms, peer work,...); sex work (out reach and drop in center interventions; the main areas: HIV/AIDS ans STI, health promotion, violence and exploitation, human and civil rights, empowerment; methods: peer education, counselling and support, use of internet, informative materials,...; intervention with sex workers, clients and managers); ohter progras (alcohol consumption, ...)
Expositive, group discussions, study visits to social intervention and harm reduction projects.
| designation | Weight (%) |
|---|---|
| Exame | 50,00 |
| Trabalho de campo | 50,00 |
| Total: | 100,00 |
To get approval, 10 points minimum at the sum of different evaluation components is necessary. Evaluation will be based on the students performance in a final writen exam and in a work made in group. Both components count 50% for the final classification.
The result will be the sum of the classifications obtained in the different evaluation components:
- performance in the workgroup;
- final written exam
Presence in classes is very important but it is not mandatory for more than 75% of them.
The final classification (between 0 and 20) is obtained through the following calculation: it is necessary that the student gets at least 10 points in each of those evaluation components and the final classification must be of at least 10. Missing one of those evaluation components will make it impossible to get approval.
The students with specific statutes will be evaluated in the same way.
The attemp to improve the final result will be possible by repeating, only once, the final exam in the subsequent seaso to that when approval was reached and whenever the UC has exam scheduled. the improvement will only be appliable to 50% of thr classification refering to the final exam.