High Voltage Monophasic Pulsed Current (HVMPC) for stage II-IV pressure ulcer healing. A systematic review and meta-analysis

• Tipo: Outra Publicação em Revista Científica Internacional
• Data: 2018

Autores

Beshoy Girgis (Autor) Outra; José Alberto Duarte (Autor) FADEUP

Revista

Título: Journal of tissue viability

Vol. 27 Nº 4

Páginas: 274-284

ISSN: 0965-206X

Editora: Tissue Viability Society

Indexação

ISI Web of Knowledge - 0 Citações

Scopus - 0 Citações

Classificação Científica

FOS: Ciências sociais

Outras Informações

ID Authenticus: P-00P-PWQ

DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2018.08.003

Abstract (EN): This review was conducted to determine and quantify the efficacy of high-voltage monophasic pulsed current (HVMPC) in the treatment of stage II-IV pressure ulcers (PrUs), identify the details of HVMPC intervention parameters and the superior protocol, and ascertain other potential benefits and the safety of HVMPC intervention. Eleven studies, nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two case series studies, matched the criteria and were included in the systematic review, whereas, only level 1 evidence RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The percentage of wound surface area reduction per week was 12.39%; 95% CI, [10.43-14.371 for HVMPC plus standard wound care (SWC) and 6.96%; 95% CI, [5.56-8.38] for SWC alone or SWC plus sham HVMPC. The net effect of HVMPC was 5.4% per week (an increase of 78% greater than SWC alone or SWC plus sham HVMPC). Level 1, 2 and 4 evidence studies have consistently indicated that HVMPC plus SWC were more effective than SWC alone or SWC plus sham HVMPC in treating stage II-IV PrUs. Level 1 evidence studies showed that HVMPC intervention improved the healing of PrUs (reduced wound surface area), and combined with SWC, increased the probability of complete healing and almost eliminated the probability of worsening of healing. HVMPC intervention was shown to be relatively safe, with rare adverse reactions.

Idioma: Inglês

Tipo (Avaliação Docente): Científica

Nº de páginas: 11