Validity of classical fetal weight charts in the Portuguese population [Validade das tabelas de peso fetal clássicas para a população Portuguesa]

• Tipo: Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional
• Data: 2011

Autores

Santos, RFS (Autor) Outra; Miguelote, RFO (Autor) Outra; Coelho, DMS (Autor) Outra; Andrade, AMAV (Autor) Outra; Santos, CMNC (Autor) FMUP; Bernardes, JFMAL (Autor) FMUP; Cruz Correia, RJ (Autor) FMUP

Revista

Título: Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia

Vol. 33 Nº 4

Páginas: 164-169

ISSN: 0100-7203

Editora: Thieme

Indexação

ISI Web of Knowledge

Scopus - 3 Citações

Outras Informações

ID Authenticus: P-007-ZR2

Abstract (EN): PURPOSE: to assess the validity of several fetal weight charts, commonly used in Portugal, to classify its population. METHODS: observational retrospective study. Singleton birth data was analyzed, from a two- year period (May 2008 to April 2010), from pregnancies with an ultrasound in the same institution, between the 8th and 14th gestational week. Upon data validation, percentiles for each completed gestational week were created, smoothed by a quadratic function, analyzed and compared to the tables more commonly utilized, in the institution and country, by using Z-scores, percentile comparison, sample 10th percentile detection sensibility and birthweight means comparison. RESULTS: a total of 5,378 newborns (NB) were born in the period; 2,195 (42%) NB were included, born from the 24th to 42nd gestational week, allowing statistical analysis from the 34th to the 41st week. There were differences in the mean birthweight for each gestational age, between references and with the sample, as well as between sexes. The 10th percentile from some references has shown differences ranging from -288g at 37 weeks (-11% in Lubchenco et al. data), with and +133g at 34 weeks (+7,6% with Carrascosa et al. data) compared to the values found with the sample. Differences were also found concerning the sensitivity of the identification of a sample birthweight below the 10th percentile, which was between 14.1 and 100%, depending on the reference used. DISCUSSION: the limitation of these kinds of reference values must be remembered and minimized, with the adoption of regionally or nationally produced references, contemplating other variables, such as sex, with precisely known gestation duration and with validation of the utilized references in loco.

Idioma: Inglês

Tipo (Avaliação Docente): Científica