Blood pressure on arising, morning blood pressure surge and blood pressure variability in white coat hypertensives and in matched normotensives and sustained hypertensives [Avaliação comparativa da pressão ao levantar, da subida matinal da pressão arterial e da variabilidade diurna da pressão arterial em normotensos, hipertensos da bata branca e em hipertensos]

• Tipo: Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional
• Data: 2006

Autores

Polonia, J (Autor) FMUP; Carvalho, N (Autor) Outra; Barbosa, L (Autor) Outra; Silva, JA (Autor) Outra

Revista

Título: Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia

Vol. 25 Nº 11

Páginas: 693-704

ISSN: 0870-2551

Editora: Sociedade Portuguesa De Cardiologia

Indexação

ISI Web of Knowledge

Scopus - 4 Citações

Outras Informações

ID Authenticus: P-007-GC9

Abstract (EN): Introduction: It is still controversial whether subjects with white-coat hypertension (WCHT) exhibit higher cardiovascular risk compared to normotensive subjects (NT). In subjects with WCHT it is not known whether the abnormal blood pressure (BP) reaction in the office also occurs at other times of day, particularly on arising and immediately after waking, i.e. the times at which the majority of cardiovascular events are reported to occur. Objective and Methods: To evaluate with 24h ambulatory BP measurement the values of morning BP surge, BP on arising and BP variability in subjects with WCHT in comparison with age-, gender- and weight-matched normotensives (BP) and untreated sustained hypertensives (BP). Results: Groups of BP, WCHT and BP were matched for age, gender and body weight: BP: n = 69, age 49 ± 7 years, 54% female, BMI 26 ± 1, casual BP 126/79 ± 5/4 mmHg, daytime BP 124/80 ± 6/6 mmHg; WCHT: n = 74, age 52 ± 8 years, 57% female, BMI 26 ± 2, casual BP 152/95 ± 7/7 mmHg, daytime BP 126/80 ± 5/6 mmHg; HT: n = 79, age 53 ± 7 years, 56% female, BMI 27 ± 2, casual BP 154/97 ± 9/8 mmHg, daytime BP 143/89 ± 12/10 mmHg. Of the three groups, subjects with WCHT exhibited BP on arising (121/81 ± 13/8 mmHg) similar to that of NTs (120/80 ± 13/9 mmHg, NS), both significantly lower than that of HTs (137/92 ± 17/10 mmHg, p < 0.01), suggesting the absence of an alerting BP reaction in WCHT at that time. By contrast, subjects with WCHT showed higher values of systolic morning BP surge vs. NTs (25 ± 10 vs. 22 ± 11 mmHg, p < 0.05), both lower than that observed in hypertensives (33 ± 11 mmHg, p < 0.01 vs. NT and WCHT) and greater daytime variability (systolic BP standard variation), i.e. 12 ± 2 vs. 10 ± 2 mmHg, p < 0.05, both lower than that observed in hypertensives (14 ± 3 mmHg, p < 0.01 vs. NT and WCHT). Conclusions: Although subjects with WCHT did not show any alerting blood pressure reaction on arising, morning BP surge and BP variability were greater in these subjects than in control normotensives, although lower than sustained hypertensives. Although this is still speculative, we cannot exclude the possibility that even a slight increase in morning BP surge might in the long term constitute an additional load on the circulation that could increase cardiovascular risk in subjects with WCHT compared to matched normotensives.

Idioma: Inglês

Tipo (Avaliação Docente): Científica

Nº de páginas: 12