Peer review and publication delay

• Tipo: Outra Publicação em Revista Científica Internacional
• Data: 2019

Autores

Fernandez Llimos, F (Autor) Outra

Revista

Título: Pharmacy Practice

Vol. 17

Página Final: 1502

ISSN: 1885-642X

Editora: Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas

Indexação

ISI Web of Knowledge - 0 Citações

Scopus - 24 Citações

Outras Informações

ID Authenticus: P-00Q-FGC

DOI: 10.18549/pharmpract.2019.1.1502

Abstract (EN): Selecting peer reviewers is a crucial stage of the editorial process that ensures the quality of scholarly publications. An alternative to selecting peer reviewers from data bases created with expressions of interest of volunteers consists in systematically searching PubMed for similar articles and inviting their authors to act as peer reviewers. Although this process might identify more appropriate peers, it also can increase the time of the editorial process. In 2018, Pharmacy Practice had to invite 4.70 (SE=0.33) potential reviewers per one accepting. The time from the first reviewer invitation to the last reviewer report received was 61 days (SE=2.1). These figures confirm the existence of a peer review crisis which is significantly increasing the publication delay.

Idioma: Inglês

Tipo (Avaliação Docente): Científica

Nº de páginas: 3