Dissertation
Keywords |
Classification |
Keyword |
OFICIAL |
Educational Sciences |
Instance: 2023/2024 - A
Cycles of Study/Courses
Teaching Staff - Responsibilities
Teaching - Hours
Type |
Teacher |
Classes |
Hour |
Tutorial Supervision |
Totals |
1 |
10,00 |
Maria de Fátima Carneiro Ribeiro Pereira |
|
0,50 |
Sofia Castanheira Pais |
|
0,33 |
José Pedro de Melo Rosa Amorim |
|
0,33 |
Preciosa Teixeira Fernandes |
|
0,33 |
Alexandra Ermelinda Alves de Oliveira Doroftei |
|
0,165 |
Paulo Manuel Teixeira Marinho |
|
0,33 |
Eunice Margarida B. Macedo Alves |
|
0,825 |
Isabel Maria Alves e Menezes Figueiredo |
|
0,33 |
Carla Patrícia Teixeira da Silva Figueiredo |
|
0,33 |
Angélica Maria Reis Monteiro |
|
0,165 |
Joaquim Luís Braga dos Santos Coimbra |
|
0,165 |
Rui Alexandre Teixeira Alves |
|
0,165 |
Maria Amélia Pina Tomás Veiga |
|
1,485 |
Elisabete Maria Soares Ferreira |
|
0,33 |
Sofia Ramos de Almeida Santos |
|
0,99 |
Joana Pereira de Magalhães Cruz |
|
0,165 |
Rui Eduardo Trindade Fernandes |
|
1,155 |
Ariana Maria de Almeida Matos Cosme |
|
0,33 |
Teaching language
Portuguese
Objectives
The UC aims at the production by each student of their Master's dissertation and its defense, according to level 7 of the European Qualifications Framework. It also aims to:
- the acquisition of specialized knowledge in the field of research, revealing the capacity for critical reflection and openness to the diversity of knowledge
- the development of new knowledge and procedures in the fields, populations and contexts under study
- the mastery of conducting and discussing research skills in its different phasesThe UC aims at the production by each student of their Master's dissertation and its defense, according to level 7 of the European Qualifications Framework. It also aims to:
Learning outcomes and competences
Designing, conducting and reporting surveys autonomously
Identifying problems, questions and research objectives
Identify relevant concepts and keywords
Describe the research issue
Characterize the research according to paradigms and general research strategies
Identify the population/documents/contexts to be studied
Explain the ethical dimension of the research
Design the research, elect and substantiate means of data collection and analysis
Analyze, validate and interpret research data with rigor and prudence
Structure the dissertation writing
Writing scientifically articulating the dimensions: formal, written language; the content; rigor and objectivity.
Expose and discuss your research in a perceptible and stimulating way
Working method
Presencial
Pre-requirements (prior knowledge) and co-requirements (common knowledge)
n/a
Program
Distinguish between contents of research topics (IT) and related to scientific writing (EC). In the case of IT, the contents vary according to the theme of the dissertation, always involving the individual carrying out of an original investigation, empirical or otherwise, in the domain of Educational Sciences and depending on the student's optional domain. These optional domains are directly linked to the research areas of the Center for Educational Research and Intervention (CIIE). In CE, the contents are based on the MCED standards and the styles and requirements of scientific writing in relation to research paradigms and strategies.
Mandatory literature
Amado João 570;
Manual de investigação qualitativa em educação. ISBN: 978-989-26-0655-2
Bruyne Paul de;
Dinâmica da pesquisa em ciências sociais
Quivy Raymond;
Manual de investigação em ciências sociais. ISBN: 978-972-662-275-8
Inesta Ana 070;
Escribir y comunicarse en contextos científicos y académicos. ISBN: 978-84-7827-477-2
Motta-Roth Desirée;
Produção textual na universidade. ISBN: 978-85-7934-025-3
Fátima Pereira;
Infância, educação escolar e profissionalidade docente. ISBN: 978-972-31-1313-6 (Only pp. 311-373)
Teaching methods and learning activities
They are organized in individual (SI), group (SG) and peer (SP) supervision, and autonomous work (TA).
SI. individual tutoring with the supervisor: monitoring of research development, supporting and monitoring decisions, time management, literature review and theoretical construction, conducting research and writing it.
SG. it is organized into actions of (a) discussion of the development of projects and (b) scientific writing. (a) There are 6 types: discussion of writing an introduction to the dissertation; presentation and discussion of projects at different times, of key words and concepts, concrete questions about the operationalization of the methodology, the dissertation index, and the results. (b) presentation, debate and analysis of cases.
TA: research, reading, systematization and writing; data collection and analysis, peer review.
SP. in collective sessions as a strategy and in peer reviewing texts in AT.
The evaluation takes place in public exams.
keywords
Social sciences
Evaluation Type
Evaluation with final exam
Assessment Components
designation |
Weight (%) |
Defesa pública de dissertação, de relatório de projeto ou estágio, ou de tese |
50,00 |
Trabalho escrito |
50,00 |
Total: |
100,00 |
Amount of time allocated to each course unit
designation |
Time (hours) |
Elaboração de relatório/dissertação/tese |
20,00 |
Estudo autónomo |
30,00 |
Frequência das aulas |
6,00 |
Trabalho de campo |
24,00 |
Trabalho de investigação |
20,00 |
Total: |
100,00 |
Eligibility for exams
not applicable
Calculation formula of final grade
The final classification of the master's degree, according to the Regulation of the Cycle of Studies, results from the average between the classifications of the curricular part and the classification of the dissertation's defense.
Examinations or Special Assignments
not applicable
Internship work/project
not applicable
Special assessment (TE, DA, ...)
n/a
Classification improvement
not applicable