Methodologies of Projects' Evaluation
| Keywords |
| Classification |
Keyword |
| CNAEF |
Social Studies/Public Policies / Educational Sciences |
Instance: 2016/2017 - A 
Cycles of Study/Courses
Teaching language
Suitable for English-speaking students
Objectives
The UC Assessment Methodology Project (MAP) is guided by the following objectives:
1. Deeper knowledge of theoretical and methodological models of AP
a) discuss specifics of various valuation models;
b) meet and discuss scientific criteria of evaluation;
. 2 Develop critical thinking about MAP;
a) reflect on features, functions and effects of various types of assessment, based on the principles underlying them
b) characterize roles of evaluators and evaluated in various evaluation models;
Learning outcomes and competences
It is expected the development of skills:
1. socio-educational intervention project analysis;
2. Production of opinions, based on Evaluation Project (indicating strengths and weaknesses and aspects to improve the methodological level)
3. Design and development Assessment Project (problem / situation to assess, objectives, dimensions to evaluate, instruments / procedures of collection / data processing, data analysis and presentation of results).
Working method
Presencial
Pre-requirements (prior knowledge) and co-requirements (common knowledge)
Not applicable
Program
To achieve the obejtivos UC examines the following contents:
1 What we talk about when we talk about evaluation -.? Framing of
2. Subjectivist and objectivist models of evaluation
. 3 Project Evaluation: Principles, concepts and perspectives
a) Internal assessment, self-assessment and external assessment: concepts, procedures and tools
b) The self-evaluation of schools: concepts, procedures and tools
4. Evaluation as construction of meaning
a) Participatory evaluation: functions and characteristics
b) Assessment, monitoring and management: concepts and logical
c) Steps in planning a project and its evaluation criteria
5. A community assessment projects
a) The evaluation of projects in the context of social inclusion: Reflections from a practical
REVER O INGLÊS
Mandatory literature
BONNIOL, J-J. & Vial, M. ; Modelos de avaliação. , Portalegre: Artmed, 2001
CORTESÃO, L., LEITE, C. e PACHECO, J. A. ; Trabalhar por projectos em educação. Uma inovação interessante? , Porto: Porto Editora. ISBN: 2002
CAPUCHA, L. M. A. (2008); Planeamento e Avaliação de Projectos. Guia prático. , Ministério da Educação, 2008
MONTEIRO, Alcides ; A avaliação em projectos de intervenção social: […]”, in Sociologia, problemas e práticas, metodologias de avaliação nº 22. pp. 137-154., Lx: ISCTE., 2000
Carlinda Leite , Preciosa Fernandes; A auto-avaliação das escolas no sistema educativo português: do discurso legal aos sentidos dos processos em curso Publicação com texto(s) associado(s), ELO: revista do Centro de Formação Francisco de Holanda, nº 17, pp.59-70,, 2010
LEITE, Gomes & Fernandes.; «Acompanhamento avaliativo de Projetos», in Leite, Gomes e Fernandes […]. pp 51-54., Porto: Asa., 2001
Carlinda Leite , Preciosa Fernandes ; Inovação pedagógica: uma resposta às demandas da sala de aula universitária, Perspectiva: revista do Centro de Ciências da Educação, Vol.29 nº 2, pp.507-533, , 2011
Teaching methods and learning activities
The methodology is based on an active pedagogy, recognition of students as agents in the construction of their training. The approach of concepts and theoretical perspectives on educational evaluation is accompanied by discussion and expanded with the reflections produced from the submission of a project. So in contact time, students, in groups, present to the class a project of socio-educational assessment, emphasizing the methodological dimension. In time of autonomous work analyzing a project and organize your presentation to the class; structure a dynamic discussion and research literature to support the individual work. Students are monitored in tutorials.
keywords
Social sciences
Evaluation Type
Distributed evaluation without final exam
Assessment Components
| designation |
Weight (%) |
| Participação presencial |
50,00 |
| Trabalho escrito |
50,00 |
| Total: |
100,00 |
Amount of time allocated to each course unit
| designation |
Time (hours) |
| Apresentação/discussão de um trabalho científico |
5,00 |
| Estudo autónomo |
25,00 |
| Frequência das aulas |
102,00 |
| Trabalho de investigação |
30,00 |
| Total: |
162,00 |
Eligibility for exams
Calculation formula of final grade
The evaluation is distributed in final exam. The continuous evaluation includes:
realization of a working group for analysis and presentation of an evaluation project; 50%
- Individual work, focused on a metavaliação on the intervention process carried out in the probationary period.
Examinations or Special Assignments
Not applicable
Internship work/project
Not applicable
Special assessment (TE, DA, ...)
Assessment protocols are established for working students and students with special educational needs (SEN)
Classification improvement
The improvement of the final classification is carried out under the terms provided for by law and by revising the critical synthesis / final work.
Observations
Not applicable