Resumo (PT):
Abstract (EN):
Right through the history of social housing in Portugal, a first cycle can be
circumscribed that closes in the 1930s. Here the degree of intervention of the central
administration for the resolution of the decent housing deficit had been previously
discussed and simultaneously the construction of a diverse set of solutions which
functioned as models to test against slums. On the one hand, the so-called “casa
barata” (cheap house) began to be seen as an important political instrument in the
struggle for power and social control; on the other hand, it continued to be
understood as desirable real estate integrated in the complex fabric of economic
interests woven into urban housing production. Although the operations conducted
in this period and dominated by the First Republic were episodic and insignificant
compared to the country's housing needs, some continue to have historical relevance
as test balloons in the positivist laboratory that was the universe of republicanism.1 Some
neighbourhoods were authentic condensers of the complex debate inherited from the
eighteenth century, which, based on scientism, sought in this way the orderly and
progressive reform of society2 in order to, among other issues, solve the so-called
social question in which the problem of working-class housing was included.3
Confronted with the overwhelming rhythms of social and technical-scientific
progress of the first decades, affordable housing was to be one of the most sensitive
architectural programmes in the synthesis between tradition, history and modernity.
In the disciplinary field of architecture, in many cases the economic, social and cultural
valuation of the new dwelling and its particular technical and formal constraints
redirected the modus operandi and the professional interest of the architect onto
other themes hitherto adjacent to the central problem of style. In this transformational
process of the architectural field, one of the aspects that must be mentioned concerns
the regulation and normalization imposed by the hygienist rationality, putting the
binomial art and science at stake. Thus, the main objective of this paper is to contribute
to a reading of some pre-1933 economic districts centred on the international effect
of hygiene considered as scientific knowledge and, also, a programme of values. In
particular, in the light of a more precise explanation of modern breathing in the late
1920s, the document is structured in two parts, comprising, respectively, the
definition of control measures imposed on house design , and use of a formal, clearly
purified and diaphanous lexicon, determined by the triangulation between art, economy
and hygiene.
Type (Professor's evaluation):
Scientific