| Code: | LPSI304 | Acronym: | DG |
| Keywords | |
|---|---|
| Classification | Keyword |
| OFICIAL | Psychology |
| Active? | Yes |
| Responsible unit: | Psychology |
| Course/CS Responsible: | First degree in Psychology |
| Acronym | No. of Students | Study Plan | Curricular Years | Credits UCN | Credits ECTS | Contact hours | Total Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPSIC | 174 | Official Curricular Structure | 3 | - | 3 | 27 | 81 |
| Teacher | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Sandra Cristina da Silva Reis Torres |
| Theoretical and practical : | 2,00 |
| Type | Teacher | Classes | Hour |
|---|---|---|---|
| Theoretical and practical | Totals | 6 | 12,00 |
| Filipa Elvira Mucha Vieira | 4,00 | ||
| Sandra Cristina da Silva Reis Torres | 8,00 |
The main objective of this course is to provide students with fundamental knowledge and skills in group intervention, focusing on the different types of group interventions and the dynamics that may arise during the process. Additionally, this course aims to enhance students' personal development through transversal and transferable skills such as self-knowledge, social skills, and critical thinking. The course also integrates a perspective attentive to diversity and inclusion, promoting an understanding of the impact of individual, cultural, and social differences on group dynamics, and encouraging practices that support collaborative and respectful environments that value plurality.
At the end of the semester, students are expected to be able to plan a group intervention in different settings, defining the group type, the characteristics of the participants and the intervention aims. It is also expected that, as a result of their experience as participating members of a group, students will present improvements in self-knowledge and communication skills, as well as the assimilation of theoretical notions based on practice.
This course addresses the following topics:
This course prioritizes the methodology of active participation. Students participate as active members in a development group (Training Group - Group T; Guerra et al., 2014), which is formed by the class and adapted accordingly. In this approach, skill training is primarily stimulated through group dynamics techniques. The active methodology is alternated with expository and interrogative methods to systematically and theoretically contextualize the content addressed.
Assessment is distributed without a final exam, considering the following components (and respective weighting in the final grade):
1) Participation in classes (25%);
2) Completion of a written assignment consisting of planning a group intervention based on a provided scenario (75%).
(25% + 75% = 100%)
| designation | Weight (%) |
|---|---|
| Participação presencial | 25,00 |
| Trabalho escrito | 75,00 |
| Total: | 100,00 |
| designation | Time (hours) |
|---|---|
| Estudo autónomo | 21,00 |
| Frequência das aulas | 30,00 |
| Trabalho escrito | 30,00 |
| Total: | 81,00 |
Attendance at classes is required. Students must be present in 75% of the taught classes.
Assessment is distributed without a final exam, considering the following components (and respective weighting in the final grade):
1) Participation in classes (25%);
2) Completion of a written assignment consisting of planning a group intervention based on a provided scenario (75%).
(25% + 75% = 100%)
The assessment of the participation in classes is based on the following criteria:
. Spontaneous participation in open discussions
. Development of communication skills
. Demonstration of reflective ability in class
. Assiduous and punctual presence
Students are required to fill out a self-assessment form for these criteria.
The two components and the final grade are expressed on a scale ranging from 0 to 20.
Students who have attended the course in previous years without getting approval can attend the course again, and in this case, the current assessment conditions will be applied. For students who choose to ask dispense from class attendance (only granted if there is previous attendance of at least 75% of the taught classes), the assessment to get approval consists of the following components:
1) The assignment proposed for the current academic year (75%), performed individually;
2) The remaining 25% is relative to the practical component assessed during the year in which students attended classes.
(75% + 25% = 100%)
The two components and the final grade are expressed on a scale ranging from 0 to 20.
Students with special conditions who choose not to attend classes must do (individually) the assignment proposed for the current academic year (75%). The remaining 25% is relative to a written assignment over the main contents of the subject, done individually.
(75% + 25% = 100%)
The two components and the final grade are expressed on a scale ranging from 0 to 20.
It is only possible to improve the assignment, which has a weighting of 75% in the final grade.
It is not possible to improve the practical component. (25% of the final grade)
(75% + 25% = 100%)
Grade improvement can only be done once, until a supplementary assessment of the year following the one in which approval was obtained.
The two components and the final grade are expressed on a scale ranging from 0 to 20.