Reproductive Health Psychology
| Keywords |
| Classification |
Keyword |
| OFICIAL |
Psychology |
Instance: 2022/2023 - 1S 
Cycles of Study/Courses
Teaching language
Portuguese
Obs.: Reproductive Health Psychology - suitable for English speakers
Objectives
* familiarize students with Reproductive Health Psychology;
* allow to know the different fields and intervention of the psychologist within Reproductive Health;
* sensitize to basic intervention skills within Reproductive Health specific contexts;
* promote a critical view on Reproductive Health policies;
* foster a proactive atitude regarding inclusion when considering the different options individuals have throughout their reproductive life cycles.
Learning outcomes and competences
Having successfully completed this course the student will be able to:
- Outline the types of topics and problems reproductive health psychology is concerned with
- Understand reproductive health from a global and multi-perspective analysis regarding awareness, engagement and prevention
- Demonstrate a knowledge of research in reproductive health psychology and critically evaluate different perspectives and key studies, as well as claims made in popular media for their scientific merit
- Describe and evaluate key health psychology theories that support psychological intervention within reproductive health
- Apply the obtained knowledge in theories and research findings to address reproductive health-related issues
Working method
Presencial
Program
- Reproductive health: clinical, social, anthropological and psychological perspectives
- Major Health Psychology theories and empirical research in Reproductive Health Psychology
- Sexual education throughout the lifecycle
- Family planning and the reproductive life plan
- Gestational loss and abortion
- Pregnancy and the transition to parenthood
- Assisted reproductive techniques
- Menopause and andropause
- Psychological and counselling training of reproductive health professionals
Mandatory literature
Olga B. A. Van den Akker;
Reproductive health psychology. ISBN: 978-0-470-68337-8
Martins M.V., Peterson B, Almeida V, Mesquita-Guimarães J and Costa M (2014); Dyadic dynamics of perceived social support in couples facing infertility. Human Reproduction 2014; 29:83-89. (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258445854_Dyadic_Dynamics_of_Perceived_Social_Support_in_Couples_Facing_Infertility)
Martins, M. V., Basto-Pereira, M., Pedro, J., Peterson, B., Almeida, V., Schmidt, L., & Costa, M. E. (2016). ; Male psychological adaptation to unsuccessful medically assisted reproduction treatments: a systematic review. Human reproduction update, 22(4), 466-478. (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299394210_Male_Psychological_Adaptation_to_Unsuccessful_Medically_Assisted_Reproduction_Treatments_A_Systematic_Review)
Pedro, J., Brandão, T., Schmidt, L., Costa, M. E., & Martins, M. V. (2018). ; What do people know about fertility? A systematic review on fertility awareness and its associated factors. Upsala journal of medical sciences, 123(2), 71-81 (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325871761_What_do_people_know_about_fertility_A_systematic_review_on_fertility_awareness_and_its_associated_factors)
Women’s emotional adjustment to IVF: a systematic review of 25 years of research. Human Reproduction Update,13(1): p. 27-36.; Verhaak, C.M., et al.(2007)
Complementary Bibliography
da Silva, A. D., Costa, M. E., & Martins, M. ; A vivência do luto por perda gestacional na perspectiva do casal: revisão de escopo. Revista Brasileira de Sociologia da Emoção,18(54), 77-86. (https://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/handle/10216/124109)
Martins, M. V., Peterson, B. D., Almeida, V. M., & Costa, M. E. (2011).; Direct and indirect effects of perceived social support on women's infertility-related stress. Human Reproduction, 26(8), 2113-2121. (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51150558_Direct_and_indirect_effects_of_perceived_social_support_on_women%27s_infertility-related_stress)
Schmidt, L. (2009); Social and psychological consequences of infertility and assisted reproduction-what are the research priorities? Human Fertility, 12(1): p. 14-20.
World Health Organization, United Nations Population Fund, & Key Centre for Women's Health in Society. (2009). ; Mental health aspects of women's reproductive health: a global review of the literature.
Greil, A. L., Slauson‐Blevins, K., & McQuillan, J. (2010); The experience of infertility: a review of recent literature. Sociology of health & illness, 32(1), 140-162.
Kirkman-Brown, J. C., & Martins, M. V. (2020). ; ‘Genes versus children’: if the goal is parenthood, are we using the optimal approach?. Human Reproduction, 35(1), 5-11. (https://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/bitstream/10216/125322/2/374806.pdf)
Teaching methods and learning activities
All classes have both a theoretical and practical component, involving i) the exposure of contents and discussion with contributes from both the teacher and students; ii) the acquisition of soft skills through role-playing and problem-solving exercises in small groups, as well as visualizing and discussing videos showing interventions within reproductive health psychology.
Evaluation consists of three mandatory parts:
(A) 2 tests of continuous evaluation (35%)
(B) Group presentation (40%)
(C) Participation in class: student is graded for the continuous participation and for the commentary on a presentation of a selected group or theme (25%)
Final grade = (A)*0,35+(B)*0,40+ (C)*0,25
Evaluation Type
Distributed evaluation without final exam
Assessment Components
| designation |
Weight (%) |
| Participação presencial |
25,00 |
| Teste |
35,00 |
| Trabalho prático ou de projeto |
40,00 |
| Total: |
100,00 |
Amount of time allocated to each course unit
| designation |
Time (hours) |
| Apresentação/discussão de um trabalho científico |
1,00 |
| Elaboração de projeto |
30,00 |
| Estudo autónomo |
10,00 |
| Frequência das aulas |
30,00 |
| Trabalho de investigação |
10,00 |
| Total: |
81,00 |
Eligibility for exams
The student must be present in 75% of the given lectures. Approval requires a minimum grade of 9/20 on the project, and 7/20 on tests.
Calculation formula of final grade
Final grade = (A)*0,35+(B)*0,40+ (C)*0,25
Internship work/project
When delivering your project the following declaration should be delivered (UPorto ethics code
Despacho nº GR.06/12/2017):
"We hereby declare that the present project is of our own authorship and has not been used previously in other courses or institutions. Citations to other authors strictly obey the rules of authorship attribution and are indicated both throughout the text and on the references section following the indicated output style. I am aware that the practice of plagiarism and self- plagiarism constitute an illicit academic act".
Special assessment (TE, DA, ...)
Follows the general rules of FPCEUP (art. 11).
Classification improvement
You could improve the following classifications: a) project, by presenting a reviewed version; and b) tests.
The final grade is calculated with the highest scores.
Improvements are accepted only once, and within the following year after approval (general assessment rules, University of Porto)