Group Dynamics

Code:

LPSI304

Acronym:

DG

Keywords
Classification	Keyword
OFICIAL	Psychology

Instance: 2021/2022 - 1S

Active?	Yes
Responsible unit:	Psychology
Course/CS Responsible:	First degree in Psychology

Cycles of Study/Courses

Acronym	No. of Students	Study Plan	Curricular Years	Credits UCN	Credits ECTS	Contact hours	Total Time
LPSIC	37	Official Curricular Structure	3	-	3	27	81

Teaching language

Suitable for English-speaking students

Objectives

At the end of this subject students must have knowledge about:

- The different types of group psychological intervention

- The stages of group development

- The main group phenomena that emerge during the intervention.

Additionally, this subject sought to foster students’ personal development, namely through transversal and transferable skills, such as self and hetero-knowledge, communication and leadership.

Learning outcomes and competences

In this subject, students should acquire skills that allow them to plan a group intervention in different settings, defining the group type, the characteristics of the participants and the intervention aims.

The experience as participating members promotes the development self/hetero knowledge, communication skills, and assimilate theoretical notions based on practice.

Working method

Presencial

Pre-requirements (prior knowledge) and co-requirements (common knowledge)

There are no prerequisites

Program

This subject covers the following topics:

. The potentialities of group intervention

. Group types based on the distinction between “Therapeutic groups vs. non-therapeutic groups”

. How to plan a group intervention

. The relevance of feedback in personal and group change

. The predictable stages of group development

. Leadership skills in leading a group

. The positive and negative impact of group cohesion

Mandatory literature

Guerra Marina Prista; Intervir em grupos na saúde. ISBN: 978-972-796-339-3
López-Yarto Luis Elizalde; Dinámica de grupos cincuenta anos después. ISBN: ISBN 84-330-1254-1
Corey Gerald; Theory and practice of counseling and psychotherapy. ISBN: 978-0-8400-2854-9
Corey Gerald; Theory and practice of group counseling. ISBN: 978-1-305-08801-6
Yalom Irvin D.; The^theory and practice of group psychotherapy. ISBN: 978-0-465-09284-0
DeLucia-Waack, J, Kalodner, C. R., & Riva, M. T.; Handbook of Group Counseling and Psychotherapy , Sage Publications, Inc , 2014. ISBN: 9781452217611
Jacobs, E., Schimmel, C. J., Masson, R. L., & Harvill, R. L. ; Group Counseling: Strategies and Skills, Thomson Brooks/ Cole , 2016. ISBN: 1305087305

Complementary Bibliography

Burlingame, G. M., Fuhriman, A., & Johnson, J. E.; Cohesion in group psychotherapy, Psychotherapy Theory Research Practice Training, 38, pp. 373-379., 2001
Vopel Klaus W.; Juegos de interacción. ISBN: 84-7043-851-4

Teaching methods and learning activities

This subject emphasizes the active participation methodology. Students integrate, as participating members, a developmental group composed by the class and adapted for this purpose. The active methodology is complemented with the expository and interrogative methodology, in order to theoretically systematize and integrate the contents covered.

Assessment is distributed without final exam, considering the following components (and respective weighting in the final classification):

1) Participation in classes (20%);

2) One assignments based on contents of the classes (80%)

(20% + 80% = 100%)

 

keywords

Social sciences > Psychological sciences > Psychology > Psychotherapy

Evaluation Type

Distributed evaluation without final exam

Assessment Components

designation	Weight (%)
Participação presencial	20,00
Trabalho escrito	80,00
Total:	100,00

Amount of time allocated to each course unit

designation	Time (hours)
Estudo autónomo	21,00
Frequência das aulas	30,00
Trabalho escrito	30,00
Total:	81,00

Eligibility for exams

Attendance at classes is required. Students must be present in 75% of the taught classes.

Calculation formula of final grade

Assessment is distributed without final exam, considering the following components (and respective weighting in the final classification):

1) Participation in classes (20%);

2) One assignments based on contents of the classes (80%)

(20% + 80% = 100%)

The assessment of the participation in classes is based on the following criteria:

. Spontaneous participation in open discussions

. Development of communication skills

. Demonstration of reflective ability in class

. Assiduous and punctual presence

Students are required to fill out a self-assessment form for these criteria.

The two components and the final mark are expressed into a scale ranging from 0 to 20.

A minimum of 10 values (0 to 20 scale) on both components are required to get approval at the subject.

Examinations or Special Assignments

Students who have attended the subject in previous years without getting approval can attend the subject again, and in this case the current assessment conditions will be applied. Students who choose to ask dispense from class attendance (only granted if there is previous attendance of at least 75% of the taught classes), the assessment to get approval consists of the following components:

1) The assignment proposed for the current academic year (80%), performed individually;

2) The remaining 20% is relative to the practical component assessed during the year in which students attended classes.

 (80% + 20% = 100%)

The two components and the final mark are expressed into a scale ranging from 0 to 20.

A minimum of 10 values (0 to 20 scale) on both components are required to get approval at the subject.

Special assessment (TE, DA, ...)

Students with special condition who choose not to attend classes must do (individually) the assignment proposed for the current academic year (80%).The remaining 20% is relative to a written assignment over the main contents of the subject, done individually.

(80% + 20% = 100%)

 The two components and the final mark are expressed into a scale ranging from 0 to 20.

A minimum of 10 values (0 to 20 scale) on both components are required to get approval at the subject.

Classification improvement

It is only possible to improve the assignment, which has a weighting of 80% in the final grade.
It is not possible to improve the practical component. (20% of the final grade)

(80% + 20% = 100%)

Mark’s improvement can only be done once, until supplementary assessment of the year following the one in which approval was obtained.


The two components and the final mark are expressed into a scale ranging from 0 to 20.