| Code: | E208 | Acronym: | OE |
| Keywords | |
|---|---|
| Classification | Keyword |
| OFICIAL | Research Methodologies |
| Active? | Yes |
| Responsible unit: | Education Sciences |
| Course/CS Responsible: | First degree in Educational Sciences |
| Acronym | No. of Students | Study Plan | Curricular Years | Credits UCN | Credits ECTS | Contact hours | Total Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCED | 65 | Official Curricular Structure | 1 | - | 6 | 57 | 162 |
The course of workshop on writing seeks to respond to different objectives for the training of students in the field of writing pratices. The course represents a prime unit of students ' self-employed work around narrative, imaginative and argumentative writing pratices. In the light of this principle, the present course seeks to constitute a broad space of training, whose favor the emergence of a dynamic relationship with writing subjectively situated, but built in the light of their learning capability to the field of textual production of critical and argumentative type. After a first block of classes that aims to open and diversify the universe writing practices, attention will be subsequently focused into an academic exercise written production, whose essay aims to develop the set of capabilities that imply argumentative writing on an academic context.
Objectives:
-Reflecting on the diversity of operations that imply writing processes;
-Perform and share different writing activities, in view of their importance from the personal, critical and academic point of view;
-Invest in personal modes of writing, with special emphasis on its narratives, autobiographical, projection, creative, critical and argumentative dimensions;
-Write texts through the use of individual and group exercises;
-Contact with the types of academic texts and their production orders.
- Practice the reality of the text as a practice of desire and pleasure;
-Relate to writing as a discursive and social practice;
-Look for textual production as a subjective production of the Self and of reality;
-Know how to produce texts with different goals and in different contexts;
-Produce various written texts with linguistic and semantic quality, and taking into account the objectives and the contexts of their production;
-Produce and revise written texts with scientific quality, according to formal criteria of presentation, organization, clarity, correctness and terminological rigour;
-Learn to build a speech and a critical interpretation of a problem, issue or subject of study;
-Know how to use, in a dynamic mode, the basic elements of the argumentative text (identification and premises agreement; construction of arguments; objections; counterarguments, conclusion);
-Know how to write academic texts, taking into account the coherence and textual cohesion, the correct use of nexus, expressions and discursive formulas, the unity, chaining and cohesion between different elements of sense of the text, such as paragraphs, ideas, concepts, quotes, paraphrases, etc.;
Do not apply
1 From the representations of writing to the relationship with the writing: epistemological, social and educational issues
2. Language, speech and text-production
2.1 the text-production: the author as reader and the reader as producer
2.2 the concept of textual competence
2.3 discursive genres
3. Biography, narrative and fiction
3.1 writing the self and writing the other
3.2 the biographical text and the subject's narrative voice
4. Memory and imagination
4.1 A visionary exercise
4.2 sensory experiences and writing
5. Argumentation and critical
5.1 academic textual production
5.2 academic textual typologies. Characteristics and principles
5.3 the argumentative and critical dimension in scientific writing
Given the theoretical-practical nature of this course, we privilege the following methods:
-theoretical approaches, debate, individual work, group work and tutorial orientation;
-Writing activities, reading, reflection and analysis of texts;
-Research works, individual and group;
-Individual and group writing work;
-Writing exercises;
| designation | Weight (%) |
|---|---|
| Trabalho escrito | 100,00 |
| Total: | 100,00 |
| designation | Time (hours) |
|---|---|
| Estudo autónomo | 55,00 |
| Frequência das aulas | 57,00 |
| Trabalho escrito | 50,00 |
| Total: | 162,00 |
Distributed evaluation without final exam, learning evaluation scheme set to this discipline, provides the "evaluation throughout the year or semester, according to the forms defined in art. 9, without final exam," (cf. Article 7). In terms of general principles, the assessment articulates with the theoretical-practical status of discipline, so obtaining frequency requires student is not absent in more than 25% of the classes provided for. It follows as a general guidance for assessing and rating the value of presence and regular and active participation of students in the sessions, which relates to the necessary attendance.
The evaluation is structured around a written work, built by students throughout the semester, and according to individual and collective modalities of writing. Such written work is a Graphic Diary whose goal is to explore and re-live the experiences of writing experienced by students during the classes, in the light of the reflection generated around the different ways of writing experienced at the course. To this end, the attendance and participation of students in the Workshop of Writing are indispensable elements to the proposed evaluation method.
The Graphic Diary is organized according to individual and collective components of writing (comments and written products made by reference to the exercises performed), including, among others, the following elements:
a) texts written and rewritten;
b) revised texts by pairs;
c) sustained readings and reflections;
d) memory and critical discussion around the written processes and products;
e) individual and collective organization of the final written product;
The Graphic Diariy is valued on a scale of 0 to 20 values, having a weighting of 100% on the final assessment.
Not obtaining 10 values in classification of any of the elements of evaluation implies, by way of recourse mechanism in distributed assessment itself, an individual work written about the contents and the syllabus of this course.
Does not apply
In accordance with paragraph 4 of article 9 of regulation of evaluation, "students who by law are exempted from attendance in class may be called upon to perform a test or special work, intended to demonstrate that they possess the required knowledge and skills and previously defined in the discipline." The option selected in this field is the completion of an individual written work, whenever possible and preferably should be drafted and accompanied during the semester, and delivered at the time scheduled for frequencies and examinations at the end of the semester.
For the purposes of assessment improvement, students have an opportunity to reshape the final written work.
Does not apply