| Code: | P406 | Acronym: | ESTIII |
| Keywords | |
|---|---|
| Classification | Keyword |
| OFICIAL | Scientific Research Methodology |
| Active? | Yes |
| Responsible unit: | Psychology |
| Course/CS Responsible: | Integrated Master Psychology |
| Acronym | No. of Students | Study Plan | Curricular Years | Credits UCN | Credits ECTS | Contact hours | Total Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIPSI | 139 | Official Curricular Structure | 2 | - | 6 | 54 | 162 |
1. GENERAL AIMS
- Elaborate knowledge acquired in the two preceding CUs (Curricular Unit), Statistics I and II
- Understand the relation between research methods and data analyses procedures
2. CONCEPTUAL ORIENTATION OF THE CU
- In each module we make explicit the extent to which the contents of Statistics I and II are articulated and necessary in this CU. However,
- In terms of conceptual orientation, in this CU we refer to the “subsidiary” character of data analysis relatively to the research methods that sustain them. We therefore stress the relation with other UCs that focus on research methodologies.
- In the setting of the “statistical reasoning” of each of the tests presented, the focus is made on the principle of contrasting systematic variance vs. error variance. This principle is evidenced in the ANOVA models or in PCA, but we demonstrate its presence in several models of increasing complexity since Statistics I (t tests, Simple and repeated measures ANOVAs, r, MR, etc.)
- Strong emphasis and valuation of specific skills of interpretation and presentation of statics results, at all times supported by data analyses adequate to the research’s goals.
- Reinforcement of the importance of data analysis skills (i.e. usage of SPSS to perform data analysis), by including such skills in the tests that compose the evaluation of the CU (see Evaluation Component ahead)
- Identify the conceptual the status of the variables within a plan of data analyses: levels of measurement, relation between variables, IVs and DVs, etc.
- Definition/identification of hypotheses, or “research questions”: taking into perspective the statistics procedures required to test them (alternative possibilities and respective limits of usage)
- Acquisition of basic knowledge regarding the conceptual statistical framework of every statistics test presented
- Training in the “practice” of data analysis with the software IBM SPSS Statistics 23
- Analysis, description and interpretation of results: presentation according to the APA rules
Approved Status in the CUs Estatística I and Estatística II.
Considering, at least, 13 classes (3½H, 1st Semester)
Class 1-2 – Procedures to prepare and manipulate data files: data entry errors, treatment of missing data, detection routines and dealing with outliers
Class 2-4 – ANOVAs with more than 1 factor: factorial and mixed-design models (from the statistics rationale of each model to the analysis of main effects and the decomposition of up to 2nd order interactions)
Class 5-6 – Multivariate ANOVA: conceptual contrast with multiple ANOVAs on the DVs, model’s rationale and the variance matrices, multivariate and univariate tests
Class 7,9 - Cluster analysis with numeric variables – the K-Means method
Class 8 - Intercalary Test 1
10 – Analysis of reliability: Cronbach’s alpha, KR20, Split-Half procedures
11-12 – Principal Components Analysis: from the principle of Common vs. Unique Variance to the interpretation of factorial structures
Class 13 - Intercalary Test 2
1. STRUCTURE OF TEACHING METHODS
- Each class has a theory component relative to the statistics rationale of a test or group of tests. When considered fitting, we go back to the acquisition made on previous UCs, making it explicit how their increasingly complex learning is based on common “statistical concepts”.
- Modules’ contents are organized in such that every class has a practical component of data analysis with the SPSS. More than the “mechanics” of the process of executing an analysis, we stress the importance of knowing the statistical rationale that allows the necessary statistical decision making. Emphasis is made on the training of specific skills of analysis, description and results interpretation.
- Each module has support materials, namely one data file for the purpose of exercise. Students take part in an on-line study. Its objective is to be negotiated in the first class, and will aloe them to analyze their own data during the course.
2. CONCEPTUAL ORIENTATION OF TEACHING METHODS
- The organization of module’s contents in such a way that every class has a theory component and a practical one aims to serve a double objective: On the one hand, reinforcing the “applied” character of statistics learning with the immediate demonstration of “what does it serve for” the acquired theoretical knowledge; on the other, potentiate students orientation towards data analysis as a process that implies decision making supported by basic statistics and methodology knowledge.
- The statistical rationale of each statistic procedure is discussed with students and “broken down” in its more simple parts that go back, in most cases, to the basic principles acquired since Statistics I. Otherwise, complex analyses such as a PCA, or the test of an hypothesis that requires decomposing a 2nd order interaction, can become vacant exercises for 3rd semester students.
- Programmed contents are defined in such a manner that, when justified from the pedagogical point of view, parts of it can be excluded or some additional contents can be included.
- All analyses performed in the class are conducted with data from psychological research either ongoing or already completed. By doing so, the use of any statistics test will always have the purpose of answering a question or testing a “real” hypothesis.
From the pedagogical standpoint, the use of data files from actual research is based on the premise of training data analysis skills with a structure provided by the professor.
- In different moments of each module students will have to use the data file from the study conducted in the UC. In these “free analysis” moments the only rule external to the class dynamics is the obligation of applying, at least once, the ongoing module’s contents. Students will be encouraged to perform analyses that make use of previous modules contents, as well as those from Statistics I and II.
| designation | Weight (%) |
|---|---|
| Teste | 85,00 |
| Trabalho escrito | 15,00 |
| Total: | 100,00 |
Attendance in 3/4 of the classes is mandatory.
The final grade is the result of 3 components of evaluation, 2 of which are mandatory.
The relative weight of each component depends on the student’s option and is as follows:
(1) Tests – 2 intercalary tests, mandatory, 85% (17/20)
(2) Written Paper – Small group work, noncompulsory, 15% (3/20)
To get approval status, the student must always obtain a minimal score of 10 (out of 20) in all evaluation components.
OPTION 1 – If the option is for the 2 evaluation components, student´s score will be calculated according to the values presented above for each one: 85% + 15%.
OPTION 2 – If the option is for the compulsory component (Tests), this will determine the final grade.
1. EVALUATION COMPONENT 1 – INTERCALARY TESTS
The first component of evaluation corresponds to 2 tests performed with the actual use of SPSS software.
2.1. TESTS PERFORMED AT THE COMPUTER ROOM
The tests consist on the actual execution of data analyses. The student will be provided with a data file that he or she must know how to handle in order to execute the requested analyses. The student also has to report the results and conclusion that are demanded.
2.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA
- Knowledge of statistical procedures adequate to different research settings;
- Ability to use SPSS software to perform data analyses, including the need to manipulate files and data (for example, coding and defining variables, entering data, recoding variables, creating composite variables, file manipulation, etc.)
- Ability to describe, analyze and interpret results provide by SPSS outputs, relative to statistical procedures presented in the course.
2.2. FORMAT AND DURATION
Students have access to an individual test generated randomly. The test has the maximum duration of 45 minutes.
2. EVALUATION COMPONENT 2 – SMALL GROUP WORK DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT THE SEMESTER
The second component of evaluation corresponds to a Small Group Work, executed throughout the semester. The tasks required are the same across all the small groups and the criteria of execution and evaluation are presented and discussed with the students.
3.1. SMALL GROUP WORK
The small groups will be composed by 2 to 4 members. The work is performed in the context of a regular class, with supervision. The small group work implies the application of knowledge acquired within the CU context.
3.2. FINAL PRODUCT FOR EVALUATION
From the Small Group Work should result a written report with the no more than 7000 words (approx. 3 pages), excluding tables or figures.
3.3. NONCOMPULSORY NATURE OF THE SMALL GROUP WORK
The small group work is not mandatory. The student may choose to be evaluated solely by the Intercalary Tests. Such decision must be stated prior to the initiation of that work.
The non-inclusion in a small group until the presented deadline is assumed as the decision of the student for not including this component in the evaluation.
Students are eligible for grade improvement only on the evaluation component corresponding to the Tests.
The option for grade improvement will be eligible only in the Special Evaluation period of the CU.