| Code: | DE203 | Acronym: | APE |
| Keywords | |
|---|---|
| Classification | Keyword |
| OFICIAL | Social Studies/Public Policies |
| Active? | Yes |
| Responsible unit: | Education Sciences |
| Course/CS Responsible: | Master Degree in Educational Sciences |
| Acronym | No. of Students | Study Plan | Curricular Years | Credits UCN | Credits ECTS | Contact hours | Total Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCED | 8 | Official Curricular Structure | 1 | - | 6 | - |
The curricular unit Education Policy Analisys (EPA) aims at providing students with competences to analyse texts, discourses and political processes in education, by identifying the action of the diverse agents in education and their consequences. The Curricular Unit EPA intends to broaden the analysis of the nature of political discourses and practices and to identify their social and educational effects. Having in mind the profile of graduates aimed at, this latter dimension pretends to develop individual, social and professional reflexivity and, by doing so, to create the conditions for the exercise of the ‘sociological imagination’, i.e., the competence to build and to propose alternatives.
Objectives:
- To identify the discursive matrixes of educational discourses
- To know theories and methodologies in policy studies in education.
- To analyse educational policy texts.
- To relate the mandates addressed to education at the global, national and local levels.
- To analyse the reconfiguration of public institutions, mainly education institutions.
The curricular unit Education Policy Analisys (EPA) aims at providing students with competences to analyse texts, discourses and political processes in education, by identifying the action of the diverse agents in education and their consequences. The Curricular Unit EPA intends to broaden the analysis of the nature of political discourses and practices and to identify their social and educational effects. Having in mind the profile of graduates aimed at, this latter dimension pretends to develop individual, social and professional reflexivity and, by doing so, to create the conditions for the exercise of the ‘sociological imagination’, i.e., the competence to build and to propose alternatives.
Competencies:
- Identification of the theoretical and methodological implications of the approaches for the policy analysis.
- Identification of the political ‘themes’ in educational policies.
- Categorization of the arguments driven by schools of political thought.
Learning outcomes:
- Performing analyse educational policies.
I. Policy as discourse and text
i. Structuralist and post-structuralist perspectives: language, text, discourse and social reality.
ii The reconfiguration of social, public and educational policies in an era of transition.
II. Theories and methods for education policies study
i. Systems theory; pluralism; Marxism; neoliberalism. The project of social sciences.
ii. Discourse analysis (E. Laclau and C. Mouffe ; N. Fairclough), education policy analysis (J. Codd) and the ‘policy cycle’ (Ball e Bowe).
III. The ‘themes’ of educational policies
i. Classical liberalism (human nature, individualism, propriety and education)
ii. Social-democratic liberalism (the Keynesian consensus about Welfare state and education).
iii. Neoliberalism (the market regulation) - The ‘New Right’ and neoliberalism.
- The Austrian school and the Chicago School (political and methodological individualism).
- Neoliberalism (the Public Choice Theory and the Theory of Agency) and the reconfiguration of educational institutions.
IV. State and society in Portugal – educational policies and education
i. Portugal semi-peripheral position in the world-system and the specificities of Portuguese state.
ii. Educational policies and the development of Portuguese educational system
iii. The reconfiguration of the educational mandate in the context of the knowledge and economy of knowledge.
Presentations by the teacher, debate, presentations by the sudents. Individual and team work.
| designation | Weight (%) |
|---|---|
| Participação presencial | 25,00 |
| Trabalho escrito | 75,00 |
| Total: | 100,00 |
| designation | Time (hours) |
|---|---|
| Elaboração de projeto | 20,00 |
| Estudo autónomo | 45,00 |
| Frequência das aulas | 33,00 |
| Trabalho de campo | 8,00 |
| Trabalho de investigação | 34,00 |
| Trabalho laboratorial | 22,00 |
| Total: | 162,00 |
The students must attend at least 75% of the sessions.
The process will develop as follows:
i. Participation in the tasks distributed in each session
ii. Writing a 3000 paper (references included) with the following features:
- Identification of a problematic (theoretical introduction/ literature review)
- Identification and justification of a methodology for policy analysis
- analysis of a policy or a corpus of policy texts
- discussion of the results and conclusion
- references
The final mark of the curricular unit is expressed in a 0-20 scale. The implication of the students in the task i. will be evaluated with a maximum of 25% of the 0-20 scale. The paper referred to in ii. will be evaluated with a maximum of 75% of the 0-20 scale.
The final mark is the result of the sum of the two components of the process. The tasks i. without the final paper will not be evaluated. In this situation, students can use the extra assessment forms.
The students legally authorised to not attending the sessions will deliver, besides the paper referred to above, two reports on the bibliography about theme 1 and another on about theme 2.
Those students whishing to improve their evaluation or those who could not meet the regular procedures can (re)write the paper or be submitted to an oral examination about it.