| Code: | P406 | Acronym: | ESTIII |
| Keywords | |
|---|---|
| Classification | Keyword |
| OFICIAL | Scientific Research Methodology |
| Active? | Yes |
| Responsible unit: | Psychology |
| Course/CS Responsible: | Integrated Master Psychology |
| Acronym | No. of Students | Study Plan | Curricular Years | Credits UCN | Credits ECTS | Contact hours | Total Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIPSI | 110 | Official Curricular Structure | 2 | - | 6 | 54 | 162 |
| Official Curricular Structure 2012 | 2 | - | 6 | 54 | 162 |
1. GENERAL AIMS
- Elaborate the knowledge acquired in the two preceding CUs (Statistics I and II)
- Understand the relation between research methods and data analyses procedures
2. CONCEPTUAL ORIENTATION OF THE CU
- In each module we make explicit the extent to which the contents of Statistics I and II are articulated and necessary in this UC. However,
- In terms of conceptual orientation, in this CU we refer systematically to the “subsidiary” character of data analysis relatively to the research methods that sustain them. We therefore stress the relation with other UCs that focus on research methodologies.
- In the setting of the “statistical reasoning” of each of the tests presented, the tone is made on the principle of contrasting systematic variance vs. error variance in the data. This principle is evident in the ANOVA models or in PCA, but we demonstrate its presence in several models of increasing complexity since Statistics I (t tests, Simple and rm ANOVAs, r, MR, etc.)
- Strong emphasis and valuation of specific skills of interpretation and presentation of statics results, at all times supported by data analyses adequate to the research’s goals.
- Identify the conceptual the status of the variables within a plan of data analyses: levels of measurement, relation between variables, IVs and DVs, etc.
- Definition/identification of hypotheses, or “research questions”: taking into perspective the statistics procedures required to test them (alternative possibilities and respective limits of usage)
- Acquisition of basic knowledge regarding the conceptual statistical framework of every statistics test presented
- Training in the “practice” of data analysis with the software IBM SPSS Statistics 19
- Analysis, description and interpretation of results: presentation according to the APA rules
Considering, at least, 13 classes (2H)
1-4 – ANOVAs with more than 1 factor: factorial and mixed-design models (from the statistics rationale of each model to the analysis of main effects and the decomposition of up to 2nd order interactions)
5– Analysis of reliability: Cronbach’s alpha, KR20, Split-Half procedures
6-8 – Principal Components Analysis: from the principle of Common vs. Unique Variance to the interpretation of factorial structures
9 - Cluster analysis with numeric variables – the hierachical method
10-13 - Exercises
1. STRUCTURE OF TEACHING METHODS
- Each class has a theory component relative to the statistics rationale of a test or group of tests. When considered fitting, we go back to the acquisition made on previous UCs, making it explicit how their increasingly complex learning is based on common “statistical concepts”.
- Modules’ contents are organized in such that every class has a practical component of data analysis with the SPSS. More than the “mechanics” of the process of executing an analysis, we stress the importance of knowing the statistical rationale that allows the necessary statistical decision making. Emphasis is made on the training of specific skills of analysis, description and results interpretation.
- Each module has support materials, namely one data file for the purpose of exercise.
2. CONCEPTUAL ORIENTATION OF TEACHING METHODS
- The organization of module’s contents in such a way that every class has a theory component and a practical one aims to serve a double objective: On the one hand, reinforcing the “applied” character of statistics learning with the immediate demonstration of “what does it serve for” the acquired theoretical knowledge; on the other, potentiate students orientation towards data analysis as a process that implies decision making supported by basic statistics and methodology knowledge.
- The statistical rationale of each statistic procedure is discussed with students and “broken down” in its more simple parts that go back, in most cases, to the basic principles acquired since Statistics I. Otherwise, complex analyses such as a PCA, or the test of an hypothesis that requires decomposing a 2nd order interaction, can become vacant exercises for 3rd semester students.
- Programmed contents are defined in such a manner that, when justified from the pedagogical point of view, parts of it can be excluded or some additional contents can be included. For instance, Kluster analysis is programed for a moment in which its exclusion does not affect the coherence of the syllabus. If, on the contrary, learning rhythms surpass what is outlined, additional contents will be included in the modules that justify it.
- All analyses performed in the class are conducted with data from psychological research either ongoing or already completed. By doing so, the use of any statistics test will always have the purpose of answering a question or testing a “real” hypothesis.
From the pedagogical standpoint, the use of data files from actual research is based on the premise of training data analysis skills with a structure provided by the professor.
- In different moments of each module students will have to use the data file from the study conducted in the UC. In these “free analysis” moments the only rule external to the class dynamics is the obligation of applying, at least once, the ongoing module’s contents. Students will be encouraged to perform analyses that make use of previous modules contents, as well as those from Statistics I and II.
| designation | Weight (%) |
|---|---|
| Teste | 100,00 |
| Total: | 100,00 |
Attendance in 3/4 of the classes is mandatory.
COMPONENTE DE AVALIAÇÃO - EXAME FINAL
A componente mais significativa da avaliação da UC corresponde à realização de uma Prova Escrita. Esta componente corresponde a 80% da classificação final (16/20 valores).
1.1. CRITÉRIOS EMPREGUES NA AVALIAÇÃO ATRAVÉS DO EXAME FINAL
A prova escrita realizada no final do semestre avalia os seguintes aspectos:
- o conhecimento dos procedimentos estatísticos adequados a diferentes situações de investigação;
- a capacidade para utilizar o programa estatístico SPSS para realizar análise de dados, incluindo a necessidade de manipular dados e ficheiros (por exemplo, codificar e definir variáveis, introduzir dados, recodificar variáveis, criar variáveis compostas, manipulação de ficheiros)
- a capacidade de descrever, analisar e interpretar os resultados fornecidos pelo programa SPSS, relativamente aos procedimentos estatísticos apresentados no programa da disciplina.
1.2. ORIENTAÇÃO CONCEPTUAL DA PROVA ESCRITA
A estrutura do exame final, bem como os critérios de avaliação empregues, seguem a orientação conceptual da UC. Como um todo, o exame procura replicar uma situação de análise de dados em que devem ser respondidas várias questões de investigação ou testar múltiplas hipóteses articuladas.
Implica a aplicação de conhecimentos acerca de cada teste estatístico, mas num contexto “com sentido”. Um contexto no qual o “raciocínio estatístico” requerido é consistente entre as questões do exame. Evita-se explicitamente um esquema em que cada teste estatístico é empregue numa situação de análise completamente independente do resto do exame.
Students are eligible for grade improvement doing a new Final Exam in the subsequente call.