Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Benzodiazepines in the Treatment of Patients with Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

• Tipo: Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional
• Data: 2025

Autores

Fernandes, H (Autor) Outra; Novais, C (Autor) Outra; Sousa-Pinto, B (Autor) Outra; Soares-da-Silva, P (Autor) Outra; Azevedo L (Autor) FMUP

Revista

Título: Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Páginas: S298-S298

ISSN: 0033-3190

Editora: Karger

Indexação

ISI Web of Knowledge - 0 Citações

Scopus - 0 Citações

Outras Informações

ID Authenticus: P-019-Q42

DOI: 10.1159/000546269

Abstract (EN): Introduction: Guidelines recommend that benzodiazepines (BZDs) might be used as an add-on to antidepressant therapy during the first weeks of treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) or as a first-line and stand-alone. Our aim was to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of individual BZD in the treatment of patients with GAD. Methods: In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we included randomized controlled trials including adults (>= 18 years) with GAD and comparing BZD against placebo or an active intervention. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the confidence in network meta-analysis (CINeMA) framework. This study is registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42022330264). Results: We included 56 studies (7,556 participants). The certainty of the evidence for the primary outcomes, as measured with CINeMA, varied from high to very low (overall; 40 comparisons scored very low, 7 scored low, and 814 scored high). Regarding efficacy, all BZDs, in general, were significantly better than placebo, but there were no significant differences between the different BZDs (high heterogeneity and inconsistency were detected). Regarding treatment discontinuation, with some exceptions, no significant differences were observed in the comparisons against placebo or other BZD (no or low heterogeneity and inconsistency were observed in the different analyses). Regarding treatment tolerability, none of the BZD showed significant differences compared to placebo, except diazepam (RR = 1.61; 95% CI = 1.32; 1.96). Moderate heterogeneity and low inconsistency were observed in the treatment tolerability network meta-analysis. Conclusion: BZDs are overall efficacious for the treatment of GAD and have a favorable safety profile. No distinctive differences were identified when comparing BZD among themselves.

Idioma: Inglês

Tipo (Avaliação Docente): Científica

Nº de páginas: 15