Saltar para:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Início > Publicações > Visualização > Intradermal Tests for Diagnosis of Drug Allergy are not Affected by a Topical Anesthetic Patch

Publicações

Intradermal Tests for Diagnosis of Drug Allergy are not Affected by a Topical Anesthetic Patch

Título
Intradermal Tests for Diagnosis of Drug Allergy are not Affected by a Topical Anesthetic Patch
Tipo
Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional
Ano
2014
Autores
Couto, M
(Autor)
FMUP
Silva, D
(Autor)
FMUP
Ver página pessoal Sem permissões para visualizar e-mail institucional Pesquisar Publicações do Participante Ver página do Authenticus Sem ORCID
Ferreira, A
(Autor)
Outra
A pessoa não pertence à instituição. A pessoa não pertence à instituição. A pessoa não pertence à instituição. Sem AUTHENTICUS Sem ORCID
Cernadas, JR
(Autor)
Outra
A pessoa não pertence à instituição. A pessoa não pertence à instituição. A pessoa não pertence à instituição. Sem AUTHENTICUS Sem ORCID
Revista
Vol. 6
Páginas: 458-462
ISSN: 2092-7355
Outras Informações
ID Authenticus: P-009-TH5
Abstract (EN): The use of topical anesthesia to perform intradermal tests (IDTs) for drug allergy diagnosis was never investigated. We aimed to determine the effects of a topical anesthetic patch containing prilocaine-lidocaine on wheal size of IDT with drugs. Patients who had positive IDT as part of their investigation process of suspected drug hypersensitivity were selected. IDT were performed according to guidelines. Anesthetic patch (AP) was placed and the same prior positive IDT, as well as positive histamine skin prick test (SPT) and negative (saline IDT) controls, were performed in the anesthetized area. Patients with negative IDT were also included to check for false positives with AP. Increase in wheals after 20 minutes both with and without AP was recorded and compared. 45 IDT were performed (36 patients), of which 37 have been previously positive (14 antibiotics, 10 general anesthetics, 6 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 3 iodinated contrasts, 3 anti-Hi-histamines and 1 ranitidine). Mean histamine SPT size without the AP was 4.7 mm [95%CI (4.4-5.1)], and 4.6 mm [95%CI (4.2-5.0)] with anesthesia. Mean wheal increase in IDT for drugs without the anesthesia was 4.5 mm [95%CI (3.3-5.7)] and with anesthesia was 4.3 mm [95%CI (2.8-5.8)]. No statistical significant differences were observed between skin tests with or without AP for histamine SPT (P=0.089), IDT with saline (P=0.750), and IDT with drugs (P=0.995). None of the patients with negative IDT showed positivity with the AP, or vice-versa. The use of an AP containing prilocaine-lidocaine does not interfere with IDT to diagnose drug allergy, and no false positive tests were found.
Idioma: Inglês
Tipo (Avaliação Docente): Científica
Nº de páginas: 5
Documentos
Não foi encontrado nenhum documento associado à publicação.
Publicações Relacionadas

Da mesma revista

Aligning the Good Practice MASK With the Objectives of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (2020)
Outra Publicação em Revista Científica Internacional
Bousquet, J; Farrell, J; Illario, M; Onorato, GL; Bedbrook, A; Czarlewski, W; Micheli, Y; Arnavielhe, S; Ansotegui, IJ; Anto, JM; Bachert, C; Basagana, X; Bedard, A; Benveniste, S; Bergmann, KC; Bewick, M; Bindslev Jensen, C; Bjermer, L; Blain, H; Bosnic Anticevich, S...(mais 102 autores)
Recomendar Página Voltar ao Topo
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto  I Termos e Condições  I Acessibilidade  I Índice A-Z
Página gerada em: 2025-09-03 às 20:33:04 | Política de Privacidade | Política de Proteção de Dados Pessoais | Denúncias