Dynamic balance and mobility explain quality of life in HFpEF, outperforming all the other physical fitness components

• Tipo: Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional
• Data: 2020

Autores

Cristine Schmidt (Autor) Outra; Mário Santos (Autor) Outra; Lucimere Bohn (Autor) FADEUP; Bruno Miguel Delgado (Autor) Outra; Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves (Autor) FADEUP; Adelino Leite-Moreira (Autor) Outra; José Oliveira (Autor) FADEUP

Revista

Título: Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia

Vol. 114 Nº 4

Páginas: 701-707

ISSN: 0066-782X

Editora: Sociedad Brasileira De Cardiologia

Indexação

ISI Web of Knowledge - 3 Citações

Scopus - 3 Citações

Classificação Científica

FOS: Ciências sociais

Outras Informações

ID Authenticus: P-00S-6PP

DOI: 10.36660/abc.20190080

Abstract (EN): Background: Physical fitness is an important determinant of quality of life (QoL) in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients. However, how the different physical fitness components correlate with the specific dimensions of QoL in HFpEF patients remains unknown. Objective: To evaluate the association between different physical fitness components and QoL dimensions in HFpEF patients, and, assess which physical fitness components were independently associated to QoL. Methods: Patients with HFpEF were assessed for physical fitness [dynamic balance and mobility (8-foot-up-and go test), upper body strength (handgrip), cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) (6-minute-walking test) and body composition (body mass index)]and for QoL (Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire). Partial correlation was used to verify the association between physical fitness components and QoL dimensions. The determination of independent predictors in QoL dimensions was assessed through stepwise multivariate linear regression analysis. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: Both CRF and dynamic balance and mobility are significantly associated with the total score and physical dimensions of QoL (p<0.05), but only dynamic balance and mobility were concomitantly associated with the emotional dimension (r=0.597; p=0.004). Dynamic balance and mobility were independently associated with total score (beta=0.651; r(2)=0.424; p=0.001), physical (beta=0.570; r(2)=0.324; p=0.04) and emotional (beta=0.611; r(2)=0.373 p=0.002) dimensions of QoL. Conclusion: Our data suggests that dynamic balance and mobility better assess QoL than CRF, which is commonly measured in clinical practice. Whether interventions specifically targeting dynamic balance and mobility have different impacts on QoL remains unknown.

Idioma: Inglês

Tipo (Avaliação Docente): Científica

Notas: Artigo também publicado em Português

Nº de páginas: 7