Internship | Training

Code:

CC3010

Acronym:

CC3010

Level:

300

Keywords
Classification	Keyword
OFICIAL	Computer Science

Instance: 2016/2017 - 2S

Active?	Yes
Web Page:	http://www.dcc.fc.up.pt/estagio-1ciclo
Responsible unit:	Department of Computer Science
Course/CS Responsible:	Bachelor in Computer Science

Cycles of Study/Courses

Acronym	No. of Students	Study Plan	Curricular Years	Credits UCN	Credits ECTS	Contact hours	Total Time
L:CC	15	Plano de estudos a partir de 2014	3	-	18	486	486
MI:ERS	11	Plano Oficial desde ano letivo 2014	3	-	18	486	486

Teaching language

Suitable for English-speaking students

Objectives

The internship aims to assess the students' ability to meet the real world challenges and to promote their professional integration in IT companies.

Learning outcomes and competences

During the internship students should be able to:

1. be integrated in the company's work processes ;

2. apply the knowledge gained in the first three years of the study cycle in analyzing and solving business problems.

Working method

Presencial

Program

The internship proposals are provided by companies with which the Department of Computer Science, through the Faculty of Science, maintains cooperation agreements. The proposals are validated by the faculty member responsible for this course.

Mandatory literature

<>; <> (To be suggested by the external supervisor)

Teaching methods and learning activities

The internship will be supervised by the company. The final grade will be given based on the assessment reported by the company and on a final report prepared by the student.

Evaluation Type

Distributed evaluation with final exam

Assessment Components

designation	Weight (%)
Defesa pública de dissertação, de relatório de projeto ou estágio, ou de tese	50,00
Trabalho prático ou de projeto	50,00
Total:	100,00

Amount of time allocated to each course unit

designation	Time (hours)
Elaboração de relatório/dissertação/tese
Realização de Estágio
Total:	0,00

Calculation formula of final grade

The internshipwill be evaluated according to the following directives:

Autonomy with which the work was done
(Information to be provided by the external supervisor)

• Low - difficult to progress autonomously; 
• Average - some autonomy but with blocking situations that required the intervention of the advisor; 
• High - very good ability to solve problems independently eat intervention advisor focused on defining the next steps of the work.

Satisfaction of objectives
(Assessed by the report and the external supervisor's information )

• Low - reached to the objectives considered minimum for the proposed work;
• Average - the were reached wish though possibly not natotalidade;
• High - reached up fully, or even exceeded up, the objectives set. 

Intrinsic difficulty level  
(Assessed by the report)  

• Low - relatively easy work, both from a scientific or technical point of view, based onwidespread knowledge;
• Average - work with some high complexity of details requiring more advanced knowledge / expertise, either technical or scientific;
• High -  relatively complexwork, requiring a substantial knowledge and technical skills, or resulting in some innovative contribution.

		Autonomy level
		Baixo	Médio	Elevado
Satisfaction of objectives	Low	E	D	C
	Average	D	C	B
	High	C	B	A

		Suggested grade
		E	D	C	B	A
Difficulty level	Low	10-12	11-13	12-14	13-15	14-16
	Average	11-13	12-14	13-15	14-16	16-18
	High	12-14	13-15	14-16	16-18	18-20

Grades above 16 should be given to very good or excellent work, supported by a  well structured, objective and complete report, and performed with great autonomy .