Go to:
Logótipo
You are in:: Start > Publications > View > REFUGE Challenge: A unified framework for evaluating automated methods for glaucoma assessment from fundus photographs
Map of Premises
FC6 - Departamento de Ciência de Computadores FC5 - Edifício Central FC4 - Departamento de Biologia FC3 - Departamento de Física e Astronomia e Departamento GAOT FC2 - Departamento de Química e Bioquímica FC1 - Departamento de Matemática
Publication

REFUGE Challenge: A unified framework for evaluating automated methods for glaucoma assessment from fundus photographs

Title
REFUGE Challenge: A unified framework for evaluating automated methods for glaucoma assessment from fundus photographs
Type
Article in International Scientific Journal
Year
2020
Authors
Orlando, JI
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Fu, HZ
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Breda, JB
(Author)
FMUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page View ORCID page
van Keer, K
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Bathula, DR
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Diaz Pinto, A
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Fang, R
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Heng, PA
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Kim, J
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Lee, J
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Lee, J
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Li, XX
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Liu, P
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Lu, S
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Murugesan, B
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Naranjo, V
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Phaye, SSR
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Shankaranarayana, SM
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Sikka, A
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Son, J
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
van den Hengel, A
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Wang, SJ
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Wu, JY
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Wu, ZF
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Xu, GH
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Xu, YL
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Yin, PS
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Li, F
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Zhang, XL
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Xu, YW
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Bogunovic, H
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Journal
Vol. 59
ISSN: 1361-8415
Publisher: Elsevier
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-00R-61S
Abstract (EN): Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of irreversible but preventable blindness in working age populations. Color fundus photography (CFP) is the most cost-effective imaging modality to screen for retinal disorders. However, its application to glaucoma has been limited to the computation of a few related biomarkers such as the vertical cup-to-disc ratio. Deep learning approaches, although widely applied for medical image analysis, have not been extensively used for glaucoma assessment due to the limited size of the available data sets. Furthermore, the lack of a standardize benchmark strategy makes difficult to compare existing methods in a uniform way. In order to overcome these issues we set up the Retinal Fundus Glaucoma Challenge, REFUGE (https://refuge.grand-challenge.org), held in conjunction with MIC-CAI 2018. The challenge consisted of two primary tasks, namely optic disc/cup segmentation and glaucoma classification. As part of REFUGE, we have publicly released a data set of 1200 fundus images with ground truth segmentations and clinical glaucoma labels, currently the largest existing one. We have also built an evaluation framework to ease and ensure fairness in the comparison of different models, encouraging the development of novel techniques in the field. 12 teams qualified and participated in the online challenge. This paper summarizes their methods and analyzes their corresponding results. In particular, we observed that two of the top-ranked teams outperformed two human experts in the glaucoma classification task. Furthermore, the segmentation results were in general consistent with the ground truth annotations, with complementary outcomes that can be further exploited by ensembling the results.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
No. of pages: 21
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Related Publications

Of the same journal

Symmetry-based regularization in deep breast cancer screening (2023)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Castro, E; Pereira, JC; Jaime S Cardoso
Semi-automatic segmentation of skin lesions based on superpixels and hybrid texture information (2022)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Elineide S. dos Santos; Rodrigo de M. S. Veras; Kelson R. T. Aires; Helano M. B. F. Portela; Geraldo Braz Junior; Justino D. Santos; João Manuel R. S. Tavares
Novel and powerful 3D adaptive crisp active contour method applied in the segmentation of CT lung images (2017)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Pedro Pedrosa Rebouças Filho; Paulo César Cortez; Antônio C. da Silva Barros; Victor Hugo C. Albuquerque; João Manuel R. S. Tavares
IDRiD: Diabetic Retinopathy - Segmentation and Grading Challenge (2020)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Prasanna Porwal; Samiksha Pachade; Manesh Kokare; Girish Deshmukh; Jaemin Son; Woong Bae; Lihong Liu; Jianzong Wang; Xinhui Liu; Liangxin Gao; TianBo Wu; Jing Xiao; Fengyan Wang; Baocai Yin; Yunzhi Wang; Gopichandh Danala; Linsheng He; Yoon Ho Choi; Yeong Chan Lee; Sang-Hyuk Jung...(mais 37 authors)
DR vertical bar GRADUATE: Uncertainty-aware deep learning-based diabetic retinopathy grading in eye fundus images (2020)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Teresa Araújo; Guilherme Aresta; Luís Mendonça; Susana Penas; Carolina Maia; Ângela Carneiro; Ana Maria Mendonça; Aurélio Campilho

See all (10)

Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2024 © Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z  I Guest Book
Page created on: 2024-07-21 at 19:11:35 | Acceptable Use Policy | Data Protection Policy | Complaint Portal