Internship | Training
Keywords |
Classification |
Keyword |
OFICIAL |
Computer Science |
Instance: 2017/2018 - 1S
Cycles of Study/Courses
Teaching language
Portuguese
Objectives
The internship aims to assess the students' ability to meet the real world challenges and to promote their professional integration in IT companies.
Learning outcomes and competences
During the internship students should be able to:
1. be integrated in the company's work processes ;
2. apply the knowledge gained in the first three years of the study cycle in analyzing and solving business problems.
Working method
Presencial
Program
The internship proposals are provided by companies with which the Department of Computer Science, through the Faculty of Science, maintains cooperation agreements. The proposals are validated by the faculty member(s) responsible for this course.
Mandatory literature
<>; <> (The be suggested by the external supervisor)
Comments from the literature
The be suggested by the external supervisor
Teaching methods and learning activities
The internship will be supervised by the company. The final grade will be given based on the assessment reported by the company and on a final report prepared by the student.
Evaluation Type
Distributed evaluation with final exam
Assessment Components
designation |
Weight (%) |
Defesa pública de dissertação, de relatório de projeto ou estágio, ou de tese |
50,00 |
Trabalho prático ou de projeto |
50,00 |
Total: |
100,00 |
Amount of time allocated to each course unit
designation |
Time (hours) |
Elaboração de relatório/dissertação/tese |
0,00 |
Realização de Estágio |
0,00 |
Total: |
0,00 |
Calculation formula of final grade
The internship will be evaluated according to the following directives:
Autonomy with which the work was done
(Information to be provided by the external supervisor)
- Low - difficult to progress autonomously;
- Average - some autonomy but with blocking situations that required the intervention of the advisor;
- High - very good ability to solve problems independently eat intervention advisor focused on defining the next steps of the work.
Satisfaction of objectives
(Assessed by the report and the external supervisor's information )
- Low - reached to the minimum objectives admissible for the proposed work;
- Average - the objectives were reached though not entirely;
- High - reached up fully, or even exceeded up, the objectives set.
Intrinsic difficulty level of their work
(Assessed by the report and presentation/discussion)
- Low - relatively easy work, both from a scientific or technical point of view, based on widespread knowledge;
- Average - work with some high complexity of details requiring more advanced knowledge/expertise, either technical or scientific;
- High - relatively complex work, requiring a substantial knowledge and technical skills, or resulting in some innovative contribution.
|
|
Autonomy level
|
|
Baixo |
Médio |
Elevado |
Satisfação dos objetivos
|
Low |
E |
D |
C |
Average |
D |
C |
B |
High |
C |
B |
A |
|
|
Suggested grade
|
|
E |
D |
C |
B |
A |
Difficulty level
|
Low |
10-12 |
11-13 |
12-14 |
13-15 |
14-16 |
Average |
11-13 |
12-14 |
13-15 |
14-16 |
16-18 |
High |
12-14 |
13-15 |
14-16 |
16-18 |
18-20 |
Grades above 16 should be given to very good or excellent work, supported by a well structured, objective and complete report, and performed with great autonomy.