Go to:
Logótipo
You are in:: Start > Publications > View > A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies comparing off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in the elderly
Map of Premises
FC6 - Departamento de Ciência de Computadores FC5 - Edifício Central FC4 - Departamento de Biologia FC3 - Departamento de Física e Astronomia e Departamento GAOT FC2 - Departamento de Química e Bioquímica FC1 - Departamento de Matemática
Publication

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies comparing off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in the elderly

Title
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies comparing off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in the elderly
Type
Article in International Scientific Journal
Year
2022
Authors
Machado, RJ
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Saraiva, FA
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Mancio, J
(Author)
FMUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page Without ORCID
Sousa, P
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Cerqueira, RJ
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Barros, AS
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Leite Moreira, AF
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Journal
Vol. 63
Pages: 60-68
ISSN: 0021-9509
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-00W-9NY
Resumo (PT):
Abstract (EN): INTRODUCTION: Comparison of short and mid-term outcomes between off-pump CABG (OPCAB) and on-pump CABG (ONCAB) in patients older than 65 throughout a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A literature search was conducted using 3 databases. RCTs reporting mortality outcomes of OPCAB versus ONCAB among the elderly were included. Data on myocardial infarction, stroke, re-revascularization, renal failure and composite endpoints after CABG were also collected. Random effects models were used to compute statistical combined measures and 95% confidence intervals (CI). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Five RCTs encompassing 6221 patients were included (3105 OPCAB and 3116 ONCAB). There were no significant differences on mid-term mortality (pooled HR: 1.02, 95%CI: 0.89-1.17, P=0.80) and composite endpoint incidence (pooled HR: 0.98, 95%CI: 0.88-1.09, P=0.72) between OPCAB and ONCAB. At 30-day, there were no differences in mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke and renal complications. The need for early re-revascularization was significantly higher in OPCAB (pooled OR: 3.22, 95%CI: 1.28-8.09, P=0.01), with a higher percentage of incomplete revascularization being reported for OPCAB in trials included in this pooled result (34% in OPCAB vs. 29% CONCLUSIONS: Data from RCTs in elderly patients showed that OPCAB and ONCAB provide similar mid-term results. OPCAB was associated with a higher risk of early re-revascularization. As CABG on the elderly is still insufficiently explored, further RCTs, specifically designed targeting this population, are needed to establish a better CABG strategy for these patients. (Cite this article as: Machado RJ, Saraiva FA, Mancio J, Sousa P, Cerqueira RJ, Barros AS, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies comparing off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in the elderly. J Cardiovasc Surg 2022;63:60-8. DOI:
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
No. of pages: 9
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Related Publications

Of the same journal

3D printing in aortic endovascular therapies (2022)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
George M.J.; Dias-Neto M; Ramos Tenorio E.; Skibber M.A.; Morris J.M.; Oderich G.S.
Multiple versus single arterial grafting in the elderly: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity score studies (2022)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Saraiva, FA; Moreira, R; Cerqueira, RJ; Mancio, J; Barros, AS; Andre P Lourenco; Leite-Moreira AF
Red blood cell distribution width as a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes in extensive aortoiliac disease (2023)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Vieira Cardoso, N; Pereira Neves, A; Fragao Marques, M; Duarte Gamas, L; Domingues Monteiro, D; Vidoedo, J; Reis, P; Teixeira, J; Andrade, JP; Rocha Neves, J
Overview of evidence on emergency carotid stenting in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to tandem occlusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2019)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Coelho, AP; Lobo, M; Gouveia, R; Silveira, D; Campos, J; Augusto, R; Coelho, N; Canedo, A
Myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) in EVAR patients: a retrospective single-centered study (2021)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Sousa, J; Rocha Neves, J; Oliveira Pinto, J; Mansilha A.

See all (10)

Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2024 © Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z  I Guest Book
Page created on: 2024-11-03 at 14:28:06 | Acceptable Use Policy | Data Protection Policy | Complaint Portal