Go to:
Logótipo
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > Team Bruce Banner at Touché 2022: Argument Retrieval for Controversial Questions
Publication

Team Bruce Banner at Touché 2022: Argument Retrieval for Controversial Questions

Title
Team Bruce Banner at Touché 2022: Argument Retrieval for Controversial Questions
Type
Article in International Conference Proceedings Book
Year
2022
Authors
Bernardo C. Moreira
(Author)
FEUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Bruno Martins
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Fábio Goularte
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Conference proceedings International
Pages: 3055-3063
2022 Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum, CLEF 2022
5 September 2022 through 8 September 2022
Indexing
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-00X-5GB
Abstract (EN): Argument retrieval is a prominent topic in the context of current natural language processing applications. The task focuses on creating models that can retrieve coherent and strong arguments from textual sources. This technology can help individuals build an informed opinion about a controversial topic or support a particular stance on a debate. In this context, the Touché Task 1 was proposed within the scope of Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum 2022 (CLEF 2022), based on argument retrieval for controversial questions. We chose to compete with a sparse search. Despite ranking 3rd on relevance, 5th on quality and 4th on coherence, we concluded that our results are limited by our data arrangement process. The purpose of the task was to retrieve the most argumentative and relevant pairs of sentences, which could be formed with sentences from the same argument or not. Our approach focused on forming sentence pairs from the same argument, and achieved scores of 0.772 for quality, 0.651 for relevance, and 0.378 for coherence. © 2022 Copyright for this paper by its authors.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Ciências da Nutrição e Alimentação da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-11-22 at 02:51:03 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing | Electronic Yellow Book