Code: | API | Acronym: | API |
Keywords | |
---|---|
Classification | Keyword |
OFICIAL | Fine Arts/Painting |
Active? | Yes |
Responsible unit: | Fine Arts Department |
Course/CS Responsible: | Fine Arts |
Acronym | No. of Students | Study Plan | Curricular Years | Credits UCN | Credits ECTS | Contact hours | Total Time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AP | 33 | Plano de estudos de LAP_publicaçao em DR de 24/05/2021 | 2 | - | 24 | 270 | 648 |
Teacher | Responsibility |
---|---|
Sofia Torres Gonçalves |
Theoretical and practical : | 7,00 |
Tutorial Supervision: | 1,00 |
Type | Teacher | Classes | Hour |
---|---|---|---|
Theoretical and practical | Totals | 1 | 7,00 |
Luis Carlos Fortunato Lima | 7,00 | ||
Tutorial Supervision | Totals | 1 | 1,00 |
Luis Carlos Fortunato Lima | 1,00 |
The program combines painting practice and theoretical training, although the vast majority of teaching time is devoted to the practical component. The eminently theoretical component, in a theoretical class format, must exist throughout the entire academic year, in good articulation and punctuating the beginning of the work proposals. Parallel to the practical work and bearing in mind the need to enrich the students' Culture of Painting, some theoretical/compilatory research may be requested.
The program presupposes a chain of several work proposals, organized sequentially and according to an evolving degree of complexity. The different work proposals place various subjects of study, specific for the acquisition of knowledge and fundamental skills of painting, in 4 essential aspects, some of them intrinsically related: the technical and methodological aspect; the observation/representation aspect; the aspect of interpretation and pictorial and plastic expression; the aspect of composition and thematic elaboration.
The exercises always pose the need to observe one or more referents and take place in varied operative and interpretative circumstances. They request works based on reality, based on other paintings or photographs, with the possibility of combining these different referents. Objects, the human figure, sculptures, other paintings, architectural space and landscape, or the combination of all of them, are the themes - or perhaps more precisely the motifs - that allow completing the study of various matters of pictorial representation: volumes, the surfaces of things, shapes in space or the very sensation of spatial depth. The pictorial and plastic treatment of these aspects of sensible reality is complex and entails interpretative problems regarding the behavior of chiaroscuro, light and shadow, luminosity, and color. Evidently, this is an initial approach.
The privileged study of oil painting technique proves to be the most suitable to elucidate such realities.
Theoretical classes using audiovisual material. Study visits constitute a possibility of theoretical approach. In this context, intersubjective dialogue is encouraged.
The teaching method consists of a guided study: first, the theoretical elucidation of the statements and the general methodology of approaching the proposed exercises; second, during the execution of the paintings, the opportune intervention of the professor is decisive. Student monitoring is in person and permanent, in the atelier. It values the initial placement of short goals, with a progressive increase in demand. The most significant parameter of student monitoring is the differentiated pedagogy, which in general terms considers an adaptation of the pedagogy to the learning idiosyncrasies of each student, with a view to guiding the development of their unique expressive virtues and creative abilities.
Designation | Weight (%) |
---|---|
Participação presencial | 30,00 |
Trabalho prático ou de projeto | 70,00 |
Total: | 100,00 |
Designation | Time (hours) |
---|---|
Frequência das aulas | 270,00 |
Estudo autónomo | 378,00 |
Total: | 648,00 |
Obtaining approval in this Curricular Unit is subject to compliance with the prerequisite of attendance, with attendance at a minimum of 75% of classes. Students covered by the statutes provided for in the law – workers/students – or who meet other special criteria for exemption from attendance, if duly attested by documentation that must be validated by FBAUP, are an exception to this. In any case, approval is subject to satisfactory completion of 75% of the work requested.
Assessment is continuous, with two periods of periodic assessment scheduled according to the schedule proposed by the Faculty. At first, the resulting classification is informative, with the final classification being binding, with no final exam. Both reflect a quantitative classification, between 0 and 20 values.
The mark will result from the articulation of the following elements and with the following percentages of weight:
(The students' practical responses to each work proposal will be classified individually from 0 to 20 points, by observing the evaluation criteria declared for each proposal and considering comparisons with works by other students in the same class. The end-of-semester classification, in this evaluative parameter, will result from the arithmetic mean of the grades obtained in each work proposal. The end-of-year classification, in this evaluation parameter, will result from the arithmetic average between the two semesters)
(By continuous observation of the student, a score between 0 and 20 will be assigned at the end of each semester)
(through continuous observation of the student, a score between 0 and 20 and twenty will be assigned at the end of each semester)
Rating X 0.7 + Rating X 0.2 + Rating X 0.1 = Final Rating