Code: | RDIT01 | Acronym: | RDIT |
Keywords | |
---|---|
Classification | Keyword |
CNAEF | Humanities |
Active? | Yes |
Responsible unit: | Desenho |
Course/CS Responsible: | Master in Art and Design for the Public Space |
Acronym | No. of Students | Study Plan | Curricular Years | Credits UCN | Credits ECTS | Contact hours | Total Time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDIT | 1 | Plano de Estudos | 1 | - | 6 | 42 | 162 |
Teacher | Responsibility |
---|---|
Vasco Manuel Baptista da Silva Pinto Cardoso |
Others: | 3,00 |
Type | Teacher | Classes | Hour |
---|---|---|---|
Others | Totals | 1 | 3,00 |
Vasco Manuel Baptista da Silva Pinto Cardoso | 1,00 | ||
Carlos Manuel Rodrigues | 1,00 | ||
Mário Gonçalves Fernandes | 1,00 |
Four are the UC's structural goals:
- to identify and to value the common field to the Art, Science and Technology, under a culturalist perspective and mediated mainly by Drawing (in its most varied modes, methods and forms);
- to know the morphology of different territories taken from different representations and drawing practices, valuing the relation between body and form within space;
- to understand the observer´s position in the territory, both in drawing to be produced and in readings, considering the perceptual contexts proper to these representations;
- to fruitfully articulate the relationship between different typologies of graphic records, as a method, but also as a learning process per se.
Accomplishing the two designated tasks students will be able to achieve the listed learning outcomes and competences:
- to recognize and describe places and territories at different scales and at different times, using various Drawing modes;
- to master the scale of the territory in its close relationship with different ways of approaching its perception and graphic representation, over selected time intervals;
- to build and operationalize strategies for identifying and controlling the different types of deviations resulting from the confrontation between reality and representation.
Previous knowledge and skills of a 1st cycle undergraduate course, or a curriculum that may benefit from the knowledge addressed by the course.
- Perspective drawers, surveyors, topographers and cartographers: Scientific representations and fanciful representations
The adopted methodology is based on research practices, once it can stimulate active pedagogies which enable the follow up of the defined training process.
Research will be developed based in partnerships, either with peers, individuals or institutions. The promotion of field trips, debates and readings will also be of major importance. These moments will find theoretical support in the recommended bibliography, reinforcing its role in learning.
In order to complete the adopted methodological profile, it is important to underline the relevant role of a permanent, responsible, critical and evaluative debate, which will be fundamental in the assessment and reorientation of activities.
Based on these principles, it is proposed the following distribution of activities, between Contact Hours and Autonomous Work Hours.
The Contact Hours will be devoted to theoretical and practical classes, oriented towards the ongoing students’ researches. Nevertheless, the study leading to assure the transmission of the gained knowledge will also be attended. The remaining moments will be occupied with the following activities:
- presentations addressed by invited researchers, discussing experiences considered to be relevant;
- field trips, either to homologous research centres or to partner educational entities, as well as to research primary sources;
- periodical evaluative debate, keeping students, and teachers always aware of the teaching-learning process evolution, as well as of the overall grade of satisfaction among all involved. Therefore, necessary consolidations or reorientations will be able to take place whenever considered.
The Autonomous Work Hours will be reserved to:
- develop and consolidate individually and in group, the acquired knowledge;
- construct a research project based on partnerships and debate, and under teacher orientation when required by the student.
Designation | Weight (%) |
---|---|
Participação presencial | 40,00 |
Trabalho prático ou de projeto | 60,00 |
Total: | 100,00 |
Designation | Time (hours) |
---|---|
Elaboração de projeto | 75,00 |
Frequência das aulas | 25,00 |
Total: | 100,00 |
The evaluation will be distributed and will focus 100% on the research projects conducted by the students.
Considering the students' individual curricula, teachers will be able to better establish the assessment profile orientation. On the other hand, and subsequently, students will be involved in the definition of a generic body of evaluation parameters, given the challenges that the curricular unit will present to them. It is important to mention the parameters’ flexibility with respect to the developed work over time, and after discussion. However, that feature must be constrained by a strict quality criterion regarding the knowledge to be produced.
At the end of the academic semester there will be a time for all students to reflect critically, individually and in a class group, on the production of knowledge achieved, according to the established assessments parameters.
Thus placed, the student should participate in 75% of the classes, participate in the follow-up of the projects and perform, present and defend their project of representation.
The student must complete the following tasks:
- to develop a project of representation and graphic expression of a territory, approaching an integrated way and under a culturalist perspective the scientific, artistic and technological areas, and revealing Drawing as the transversal area of knowledge the one that promotes these connections;Student will belong to a research group. Therefore, we expect him to be autonomous as well as able to work in a group. Thus, the student will exercise his decision-making power over his knowledge development.
The proposed teaching method will be based on individual and collective research, such as if “Territory’s Representations, its Drawings and Images” was a laboratory. The assessment system will be of an integrated perspective, regarding the entire process and involving a common and responsible participation, both in the definition of the criteria and in its application - under the teachers’ guidance. With these two supports, we can build a process of active and participated knowledge.
Investigative work was chosen to foster a harmonious and synchronized development, both individually and as a group. Thus, and aware of partnerships and networks of knowledge, it will be possible to achieve specific knowledge and skills which were outlined as a cohesive and meaningful body.
On the other side, the followed assessment method will promote individual and collective responsibility reinforcing transversal knowledge and at different times. Therefore, it will be adequate to the development of the mentioned body of knowledge and skills