Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > SMI2

Research Methodology Seminars II

Code: SMI2     Acronym: SMII

Keywords
Classification Keyword
CNAEF Fine Arts

Instance: 2021/2022 - 2S

Active? Yes
Responsible unit: Fine Arts Department
Course/CS Responsible: Master in Fine Arts

Cycles of Study/Courses

Acronym No. of Students Study Plan Curricular Years Credits UCN Credits ECTS Contact hours Total Time
MAP 34 Plano de Estudos do MAP_Publicação em DR de 31 de agosto de 2020 1 - 3 24 81

Teaching language

Suitable for English-speaking students

Objectives

The curricular unit "Seminars of Research Methodologies II" proposes a meeting with various artistic intensities, insofar as thinking methodologies in the field of art is done in an approximation to the practice. From the discussion on what could be a "practical methodology" and the essay on its various operational modes, it is intended to trigger the invention of a theoretical-practical individual research context.

"Research Methodology Seminars II" seeks, in the same way:

1) find solutions for an interconnection between this UC and the educational path of students in the context of Master. This communication seeks that the final material produced in this course unit, incorporate any reports of the course unit that students have to deliver at the end of the 1st year of the Master;

2) To provide students with a structured document presenting a plastic project and research intentions for the potential creation of an orientation team, scheduled for the beginning of the 2nd year of the Master's program;

3) Create a document that can be used as a starting point for the work to be carried out in the course Unit Study and Research Practices;

4) Learning and consolidation of processes, notions and methodologies, simultaneously incorporating new proposals and maturing the capacity for reflection and artistic-scientific production;

5) Involvement in the production of critical knowledge and creative thinking as a means to reflect and express cultural values;

6) Encourage the consideration and knowledge of creative processes to reframe the understanding of different tools, technologies, theories, concepts and methods.

Learning outcomes and competences


  1. Understand and rehearse what could be a "practical methodology" in the field of art.

  2. Develop the individual context of research in artistic practice.

  3. Develop a critique of contemporary issues related to art and research.

  4. Exercise the ability to communicate written and oral in the argumentation of the theoretical and practical component of the research work.

  5. Develop the capacity for discussion and reflection regarding the structuring of the research project and the individual artistic practice.

  6. Build mental maps to exercise the ability to organize, structure and prioritize concepts relevant to student research.

  7. Organize round table sessions, presentations of student intentions and research, and peer review sessions among UC students.

  8. Structure a first written transitional document for the second year of MSc (2000-3000 words) structured as follows:


1- Provisional title;


2- Main research question and subsequent research questions;


3 - Abstract / Abstract (300 words);


4- Introduction;


5- State of the Art (up to 1000 words);


6- Project report (the document on the artistic practice of each student of delivery in the Studio UC;


7- Scheduling;


8- Bibliography (up to 30 references);


9- Attachments.

        9. Reveal an ethical conscience around the acts of research and production of scientific and artistic knowledge.

Working method

Presencial

Program

The “Seminários de Metodologias de Investigação II” unit will be developed considering the planed meetings with the artists: real-time meetings, meetings with variable intensities. This meetings would be the center of the program, provoking a direct experience with the fundamental question of the unit: what could be an “practical methodology” inside artist practice and experimentation. Between this meetings, suggestions will be made, considering the intrinsic relation of artistic practice with the space and the objects. This relation could have a plastic and material dimension, but also could be understood as something fundamental inside artistic work: maybe the sapce (concrete and abstract) and the “practical methodology” are coincident. We will test some tools to develop the context of individual research as: find the keyword that enhance the practical methodology; doing a reference-objects list as a sequence that apply an artistic argument; wright theoretical-visual fragments as an critical and reflexive format applied to meetings experience. To convoke the artists inside this unit as a center of the experience, it’s already a tool.

Mandatory literature

Obrist Hans Ulrich; Tacita Dean. ISBN: 978-3-86335-262-2

Comments from the literature

(some readings)
see in portuguese the complement
Estrela, Alexandre, “We shall destroy this program”, in Revista MARTE#05 – Os processos da arte, editado por Catarina Rosendo, Igor Jesus, Lígia Afonso, Rita Ferreira, Sara Brito. Lisboa: Marte e AEFBAUL, pp. 31-36, 2015.


Groys, Boris, “Politics of Installation”, in e-fluxus journal #2: New York, 2009. Harman, Graham, “The Thirth Table”, in 100 Notes - 100 Thoughts / 100 Notizen - 100 Gedanken, Nº 85. Kassel: documenta 13, Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz Verlag, pp. 4-15, 2012.
Sousa, Ernesto, Ernesto de Sousa e a Arte Popular. Em torno da exposição “Barristas e Imaginários”, Nuno Faria (ed.) CIAJG. A Oficina e Sistema Solar (Documenta), 2014.
Suter, Batia. Surface Series, Batia Suter. Roma Publication 160 e Culturgest, 2011.
Tuerlinckx, Joëlle. LEXICON a compendium of terms for Exhibition Matters/Materials by Joëlle Tuerlinckx. WIELS: Centre d'Art Contemporain, Brussels, 2012

Teaching methods and learning activities


The references and materials will be updated and adapted to the development of the UC, mentioned and given in class. This curricular unit will be developed through classes where the materials will be exposed and the tools tested, classes followed by required discussion with the students; sessions with guest artists incident on the direct show of work. Visit to an exhibition. Carrying out a written work on the individual research context to structure the research project.


 


Evaluation Type

Distributed evaluation without final exam

Assessment Components

Designation Weight (%)
Participação presencial 40,00
Trabalho escrito 60,00
Total: 100,00

Amount of time allocated to each course unit

Designation Time (hours)
Frequência das aulas 50,00
Trabalho de campo 50,00
Total: 100,00

Eligibility for exams

It is mandatory to fulfill a minimum of 75% of classes, otherwise the student will fail automatically.

According to the FBAUP First and Second Cycle Student Evaluation Regulations:

Article 10
3. It is considered that a student fulfills the attendance to a course if, considering the state regularly enrolled, does not exceed the limit number of absences corresponding to 25% of the
classes provided.

Calculation formula of final grade

Attendence: 40%
Written work: 60%

Without exam.

Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2024 © Faculdade de Belas Artes da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z  I Guest Book
Page created on: 2024-10-06 at 13:45:19 | Acceptable Use Policy | Data Protection Policy | Complaint Portal