Code: | 300302 | Acronym: | 300302 |
Keywords | |
---|---|
Classification | Keyword |
CNAEF | Architecture and Urbanism |
Active? | Yes |
Responsible unit: | Arquitectura (A) |
Course/CS Responsible: | Integrated Master Degree in Architecture |
Acronym | No. of Students | Study Plan | Curricular Years | Credits UCN | Credits ECTS | Contact hours | Total Time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIARQ | 163 | MIARQ | 2 | - | 9 | - | 243 |
History of architecture has to be understood as an art that is attaining step by step a scientific goal and not, in any case, like a evocative summing up of buildings, cities, and interventions on natural landscape in order to achieve the basic means of life in an artificial HABITAT.
The history of modern architecture aims the acquaintance of the generally so called classical architecture. The chronological scope of this discipline mediates from the end of Middle Ages until the beginning of neo-classical period.
The history of modern architecture archives that are dealt with in this discipline are mostly the deeds of “stone and plaster”. The student is invited to understand how the architect/builder of those times could deal with the architectural concepts for the coeval time being, giving them form and substance, i.e., turning the architectural concept into the architectonic matter.
The knowledge of architecture could not survive without the written documents as well as drawings that, sometimes are due to arise some unexpected hypothesis to understand unconventional matters.
To be able to “read” architecture for someone that wishes to become an architect is one end to accomplish. The reading of a same matter can be not the same for different persons with the same instruction. So it is important to be able to establish ways of interpretation and understanding upon which one can exercise a credible basis of evaluation.
Although History is in the very name of the discipline, however it is in the sense of comprehending the world of shapes and forms in order to turn architecture in a more appealing approach. The systematization of knowledge is based upon memory and intellect is founded in common items or disparate ones of the way of thinking architecture. All these items are basis of departure and return for the exercise of conceiving, “collective memories” of a common history without which the creative intelligence could not aspire to evolve. Intelligence can not be without memory. And for us, architects, emotional Intelligence is not the less important.
The main fundamentals of the study are mainly those laid by historians whose knowledge and scientific methods go on being imprescindable. Nevertheless, through History, in the most restricted sense, we architects must identify architectonic signals, the drawing signs left by men throughout his existence. Sketches that made possible the materialising of architecture, of the architecture that wanted to be but could not reach the point and was relegated only to the two dimensions of the sketch and the unbuildable architecture that could not attain its purpose because of the lack of sufficient know how. So, design as an exact, unique and autonomous discipline is also the privileged tool to evaluate the contents and the container of the architectonics.
The principal purpose and aim of this discipline can be resumed like this: stimulate the desire and accomplishment of the future architect to study architecture.
1. Medieval and Renaissance building tradition. Modern Gothic and Old vs. vs. "At Romano". Renaissance and "old" - Filaret. Renaissance and "modernity" - Palladio
2. Filippo Brunelleschi (1337-1446). Proto-Renaissance: from the medieval tradition and the revival of antiquity.
3. Alberti (1404-1472) and Roman architecture (I)
4. Tratadística: Theory of Architecture in the Treaties (I)
5. Tratadística: Theory of Architecture in the Treaties (II)
6. Classical tradition [Greek and Roman temples, classical orders]
7. Bramante (1444-1514), architect ruinante
8. St. Peter's Basilica (Basilica Constantian up from Michelangelo) I
9. Michelangelo (1475-1564) and his contemporaries (the Basilica of St. Peter)
10. Michelangelo (1475-1564): theory and practice of architecture in the sixteenth century
11. Baldassare Peruzzi (1481-1537)
12. Giulio Romano (1499-1546)
13. Serliana and Serlio (1475-1554)
14. I Palladio (1508-1580)
15. Palladio II (1508-1580)
16. St. Peter's Basilica (Michelangelo to Carlo Maderno) II: Council of Trent and split in the church.
17. Inigo Jones and the Palladian (1573-1652)
18. Juan de Herrera (1530-1593)
19. The idea of Mannerism
20. The idea of Baroque (Classicism in France, the Baroque in Italy)
21. Bernini (1598-1680) and I Borromini (1599-1667)
22. Bernini (1598-1680) II and Borromini (1599-1667)
23. St. Peter's Basilica (Basilica Constantian up from Bernini) III
24. Fischer von Erlach (1656-1723)
25. Friedrich Weinbrenner (1766-1826) and Claude-Nicolas Ledoux (1736-1806)
26. Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826) and Karl Friedrich Schinkel (1781-1841)
The discipline relies on a continuous evaluation and is expressed through the two constituents parts. The theoretical part is a result of two tests and is expressed by a PERSONAL mark (T). The evaluation of the practical part is done in three moments: two sessions of intermediate evaluation and the final evaluation reflecting the final and COLLECTIV mark (TP).
designation | Weight (%) |
---|---|
Participação presencial | 20,00 |
Prova oral | 20,00 |
Teste | 30,00 |
Trabalho de campo | 15,00 |
Trabalho escrito | 15,00 |
Total: | 100,00 |
designation | Time (hours) |
---|---|
Estudo autónomo | 68,50 |
Frequência das aulas | 74,50 |
Trabalho de campo | 50,00 |
Trabalho de investigação | 50,00 |
Total: | 243,00 |
It is assumed that a student must be present at least to 75% of the number of classes due according to timetable.
The classification of T part can be improved through a test comprehending the whole programmed matters of the discipline. The obtained classification of this test replaces the other marks of previous tests.
It is assumed that a student must be present at least to 75% of the number of classes due according to timetable.
The discipline relies on a continuous evaluation and is expressed through the two constituents parts. The theoretical part is a result of two tests and is expressed by a PERSONAL mark (T). The evaluation of the practical part is done in three moments: two sessions of intermediate evaluation and the final evaluation reflecting the final and COLLECTIV mark (TP).
In a classification from 0 to 20, if the student attains a mark superior to 9,5 at both T and TP, its final mark is obtained through the mathematical media.
Os trabalhos práticos poderão ser objecto de uma bonificação (de + 0,5 valores ou de + 1 valor) da nota em função do desempenho do grupo, numa apresentação final em formato “pecka-kucha (20X20)” que será objecto de apreciação colectiva pelo grupo docente.
Nevertheless, if the classification marks of T and TP exceeds 4 points, the lowest mark represents 70% and the highest 30% of the final mark.
If the T mark is less than 10 points and the TP superior to it, the student may attend to a rescuing test in July.
The oral test is intended exclusively verify the minimum knowledge in the theoretical part of uc. If approved in the oral component T will be classified as 9.5.
If the TP mark is less than 10 points, even if the T mark is over it, the student will not transit to the next year.
In accordance with the applicable legislation.
The classification of T part can be improved through a test comprehending the whole programmed matters of the discipline. The obtained classification of this test replaces the other marks of previous tests.
The evaluation of the practical part of the course can be further improved through revised work delivery within 15 days after the final assessment.