Caveats of the internal transcribed spacer region as a barcode to resolve species boundaries in Diaporthe

• Type: Article in International Scientific Journal
• Date: 2021

Authors

Hilário, S (Author) Other; Santos, L (Author) Other; Phillips, AJL (Author) Other; Alves, A (Author) Other

Journal

The Journal is awaiting validation by the Administrative Services.

Title: Fungal Biology

Vol. 126

Pages: 54-74

ISSN: 1878-6146

Indexing

Scopus - 0 Citations

Other information

Authenticus ID: P-00V-P5C

DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2021.10.005

Abstract (EN): Species in Diaporthe are largely reported as important plant pathogens. Identification of species in this genus has been complemented by morphological and molecular features. However, one important factor delaying this process is the struggle to formulate robust species concepts to create adequate international phytosanitary measures. Regardless of the wide use of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) rDNA region, established as the primary DNA barcode for fungi, the tendency for intraspecific variation has been reported, misleading interpretation of phylogenetic analyses. Therefore, the present study aimed to illustrate, using specific examples, how the ITS region may be problematic for species delimitation. We showed that the ITS region is highly variable, with strains of Diaporthe malorum and Diaporthe novem falling into more than one clade, which if analyzed on their own, would be likely recognized as distinct taxa. Divergent ITS paralogs were also proven to coexist within the genome of D. novem. We also suggest that ITS may have escaped from concerted evolution or has undergone a duplication event. Furthermore, this study reports for the first time the existence of a putative hybrid in the genus Diaporthe. Our findings offer new clues towards the intraspecific and intragenomic variation in the ITS region, raising questions about its value for barcoding, i.e., identifying species in the genus Diaporthe. Therefore, we recommend that the ITS region be analyzed cautiously and always compared for congruence prior to description of novel taxa. © 2021 British Mycological Society

Language: English

Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific