Seminar - High Performance Training
Keywords |
Classification |
Keyword |
OFICIAL |
Sports Sciences |
Instance: 2024/2025 - 2S 
Cycles of Study/Courses
Acronym |
No. of Students |
Study Plan |
Curricular Years |
Credits UCN |
Credits ECTS |
Contact hours |
Total Time |
2CTD |
57 |
Official Plan (2018 - ) |
1 |
- |
2 |
14 |
54 |
Teaching language
Suitable for English-speaking students
Objectives
Main aim of this CU is to provide the students with the information concerning the development of multidisciplinary
interaction and knowledge towards applied and basic research as well as professional activities. It is developed a
thematic summary of the main topics on high level training and competition.
Knowledge acquisition related to training and competition of high level athletes, in particular to the evaluation and
control of training and competition.
Learning outcomes and competences
To be able of translate knowledge into practice interventions.
Working method
Presencial
Program
1. Training evaluation and control
2.Competition assessment and control
3. The integration of the scientific knowledge into the sport practice.
Mandatory literature
Anna E Saw, Luana C Main, and Paul B Gastin; Monitoring the athlete training response: subjective self-reported measures trump commonly used objective measures: a systematic review, Br J Sports Med. 50(5): 281–291, 2016
José Maia;
A^justificação do INEX
António Rebelo Natal;
Avaliação e controlo do treino em jogos desportivos colectivos
R. Fernandes;
A^importância da avaliação e controlo do treino em natação
Teaching methods and learning activities
Seminars
Evaluation Type
Distributed evaluation without final exam
Assessment Components
designation |
Weight (%) |
Trabalho escrito |
100,00 |
Total: |
100,00 |
Amount of time allocated to each course unit
designation |
Time (hours) |
Frequência das aulas |
14,00 |
Trabalho escrito |
40,00 |
Total: |
54,00 |
Eligibility for exams
classification of at least 9,5 points in written work.
Calculation formula of final grade
classification of at least 9,5 points in written work.
Examinations or Special Assignments
To be considered casuistically.
Classification improvement
To be held on a date to be determined by the regent.
Observations
Active participation and critical reflection are fundamental aspects for obtaining a good rating.